Skip to main content

Security report for rodzinnehotele.pl

Other · Poland

Medium risk. 11 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Email security and 3 other checks.

Security score

50/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website rodzinnehotele.pl is a domain sale landing page primarily targeting potential buyers interested in acquiring the domain. It offers a simple, clean interface with a contact form to submit offers starting from 5000 PLN net. The site does not represent an active business or service but functions as a marketplace offer page. Technically, the site uses basic HTML5 and CSS3 with Google Fonts and a POST form submission mechanism. The hosting and domain registration appear linked to ddregistrar.pl, a domain registrar service. Security posture is minimal with no visible security headers or HTTPS enforcement details in the provided data, though a CSRF token and consent checkboxes are implemented in the contact form. Privacy policy is linked externally but no cookie policy or terms of service are present on the site. Overall, the site is functional but basic, with moderate trustworthiness given the professional presentation but limited business information.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

11 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

  2. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  3. DNS health

    DNS sends visitors and email to the right servers. Misconfigured records can cause outages or let someone redirect your traffic.

    • Critical

      DNS Resolution Failed

      Unable to resolve domain A records

      What to do: Verify domain is properly configured and not expired

  4. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching rodzinnehotele.pl

This scan found 26 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
37
Security headers
45
Email security
60
DNS health
45
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
10
Average
50

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The domain is positioned as a domain resale asset rather than an operational business. The business model is domain marketplace sales, targeting domain investors or businesses seeking the 'rodzinnehotele.pl' domain. There are no direct revenue streams or services offered beyond domain sale offers. The site lacks company branding, contact emails, or phone numbers, limiting business credibility. The partnership with ddregistrar.pl suggests professional domain management. Growth indicators or market positioning are not applicable due to the nature of the site. The target audience is domain buyers in Poland or related markets.

Security posture

Security maturity is low to moderate. The presence of a CSRF token and consent checkboxes indicates some awareness of data protection. However, the absence of visible HTTPS enforcement, security headers, or incident response contacts limits security robustness. No vulnerability disclosure or security policy is present. The site collects personal data via a contact form but lacks detailed privacy or cookie management on-site. No analytics or tracking scripts reduce privacy risks but also limit business insights. Overall, the security posture is minimal and could be improved with standard best practices.

Recommendations

  1. Implement HTTPS with strong SSL/TLS certificates and enforce HSTS.
  2. Add security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  3. Publish a cookie policy and terms of service on the domain landing page.
  4. Enhance form validation and CAPTCHA mechanisms to prevent spam and abuse.
  5. Provide clear business contact information and security incident response contacts.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Description
The website is a domain sale landing page for the domain rodzinnehotele.pl, inviting offers starting from 5000 PLN net. It does not provide business services or products directly but serves as a marketplace offer page.
Key services
Domain sale offer submission
Content quality
basic
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
HTML5, CSS3, Google Fonts (Inter), POST form submission
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
50/100
Good practices seen
  • CSRF token in form
  • Consent checkboxes for data processing

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
basic
User experience
basic
Content relevance
basic
Navigation
basic
Professionalism
basic
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a domain sale landing page with minimal content.
  2. No privacy or cookie policy directly on the site, but privacy policy linked externally.
  3. Contact form collects personal data with consent checkboxes.
  4. No visible security headers or advanced security features.
  5. No analytics or tracking scripts detected.
  6. No social media or company contact emails/phone numbers found.
  7. No business entity or company information disclosed.
  8. No terms of service or security policy present.
  9. Mobile responsive design with basic styling.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a simple, static HTML and CSS structure with Google Fonts for typography. There is no detected CMS or JavaScript frameworks. The form uses POST method with CSRF token protection. Hosting appears linked to ddregistrar.pl, a domain registrar platform. Performance is likely moderate given minimal content and external font loading. Mobile optimization is good with responsive CSS. SEO is basic with minimal meta tags and no structured data or Open Graph tags. Accessibility is basic with standard form labels but no ARIA attributes or advanced features. Technical risks include lack of HTTPS enforcement and missing security headers.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with rodzinnehotele.pl. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review rodzinnehotele.pl.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.