Skip to main content

Security report for rocketbiker.lv

Other · N/a

Medium risk. 9 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Email security and 2 other checks.

Security score

62/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website rocketbiker.lv is currently inaccessible due to a Cloudflare security challenge page employing Turnstile captcha, which blocks direct access to the site's content. This prevents extraction of meaningful business, contact, or policy information. The domain's WHOIS data is unavailable due to query limits, further limiting trust and legitimacy assessment. Technically, the site uses Cloudflare's protection services but lacks visible metadata, SEO, or accessibility features on the challenge page. Security posture cannot be fully evaluated but the presence of Cloudflare WAF indicates some level of protection. Overall, the site appears to be protected against automated access but lacks transparency and publicly accessible content for comprehensive analysis.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

9 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching rocketbiker.lv

This scan found 22 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
50
Email security
60
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
10
Average
62

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Due to the Cloudflare challenge page and lack of accessible content, no business intelligence data such as company name, services, market position, or sector can be determined. No contact details, social media, or partner links are visible. The domain's WHOIS data is unavailable, preventing verification of registration details or business legitimacy. The site likely targets general users but no specific audience or business model can be inferred.

Security posture

The website is protected by Cloudflare's WAF and Turnstile captcha, indicating a proactive approach to mitigating automated threats and DDoS attacks. However, the lack of visible security headers, privacy policies, or incident response contacts reduces transparency and compliance posture. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected on the challenge page, but the inability to access the actual site content limits full security evaluation. The domain's WHOIS data is unavailable, which may indicate privacy protection or query restrictions, impacting trust.

Recommendations

  1. Work with Cloudflare to reduce challenge frequency for legitimate users to improve accessibility and user experience.
  2. Publish clear privacy, cookie, and terms of service policies accessible without challenge to improve compliance and trust.
  3. Provide visible contact information and business details on publicly accessible pages.
  4. Ensure WHOIS data is accessible or provide alternative verification to enhance legitimacy and trust.
  5. Implement and verify security headers and SSL/TLS configuration on the actual website content.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Cloudflare detected. Website is behind a Cloudflare security challenge page with Turnstile captcha, blocking direct content access. These observations may be incomplete. For a fuller analysis, contact guard@offseq.com.

Business

Content quality
poor

Technology

Stack
Cloudflare Turnstile, JavaScript, HTML5, CSS3

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Site quality

Design
poor
User experience
poor
Content relevance
poor
Navigation
poor
Professionalism
poor
Trustworthiness
low

Key observations

  1. Website content is inaccessible due to Cloudflare Turnstile challenge.
  2. No visible business or contact information on the landing page.
  3. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies detected.
  4. No forms or data collection fields visible on the challenge page.
  5. No social media links or external business-related links found except Cloudflare domains.
  6. No WHOIS data available due to query limit error.
  7. Website likely uses Cloudflare for DDoS protection and bot mitigation.
  8. No SEO or accessibility metadata present on the challenge page.
  9. No visible logos or branding beyond domain name text.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses Cloudflare as a hosting and security provider, leveraging their Turnstile captcha for bot mitigation. The HTML content is minimal and serves only as a challenge page, with no CMS or frameworks detected. No analytics or marketing scripts are present on the challenge page. Performance and SEO cannot be assessed due to lack of content. The site uses modern HTML5 and CSS3 standards but lacks metadata and accessibility features on the challenge page. The technical setup prioritizes security over content accessibility.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with rocketbiker.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review rocketbiker.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.