Skip to main content

Security report for roadsafety.international

Other · N/a

Medium risk. 9 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 3 other checks.

Security score

62/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The domain roadsafety.international is currently a parked domain with no active website content or business presence. The site displays a Sedo parking iframe and Google ads scripts, indicating it is not operational for any road safety-related business or service. The lack of privacy policies, contact information, or business details further confirms the domain is inactive. Technically, the site uses basic HTML and JavaScript with no detected CMS or advanced frameworks. There is no evidence of HTTPS enforcement or security headers, which poses a security risk if the site were to become active. The WHOIS data is minimal and does not provide creation or expiry dates, with registrant information withheld, reducing trustworthiness. Overall, the domain is not currently suitable for business use and lacks any meaningful security or compliance posture.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
40/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

9 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching roadsafety.international

This scan found 21 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
77
Security headers
20
Email security
65
DNS health
70
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
40
Average
62

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention roadsafety.international, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for roadsafety.international right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

No business intelligence can be derived from the current website as it is a parked domain with no operational content. There are no indications of market positioning, services, or partnerships. The domain is likely held for future use or resale. No revenue streams, customer segments, or growth indicators are present. The partnership ecosystem is limited to Sedo parking services.

Security posture

The security posture is very weak due to the absence of HTTPS, security headers, and any security or privacy policies. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure mechanisms are present. The domain's WHOIS privacy protection and lack of registrant data reduce transparency and trust. There are no visible vulnerabilities but also no active security measures. The site is not currently a target for security risks due to its inactivity but would require significant improvements before going live.

Recommendations

  1. Register and configure a valid SSL certificate to enable HTTPS.
  2. Develop and publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to comply with GDPR and other regulations.
  3. Add clear contact information and business details to improve credibility.
  4. Implement security headers and best practices to harden the website.
  5. Remove domain parking content and deploy legitimate business content aligned with the domain name.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Description
The website appears to be a parked domain with no active business content or description.
Content quality
poor
Branding
inconsistent

Technology

Stack
HTML5, JavaScript
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
poor
SEO
poor

Security

Observed score
10/100

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Ad networks
Google AdSense
Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
poor
User experience
poor
Content relevance
poor
Navigation
poor
Professionalism
poor
Trustworthiness
low

Key observations

  1. Website is a parked domain with no active content.
  2. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found.
  3. No contact information or business details provided.
  4. Uses Sedo parking iframe and Google ads scripts.
  5. No security headers or HTTPS enforcement detected in provided data.
  6. WHOIS data is not publicly available; domain registration details are minimal.
  7. No social media or external business links present.
  8. No forms or data collection mechanisms detected.
  9. No evidence of security or compliance frameworks.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is a simple HTML page embedding an iframe from sedoparking.com and loading Google ads scripts. There is no CMS or advanced framework detected. The site lacks meta tags beyond basic viewport and robots directives. Performance is likely moderate due to external iframe loading. Mobile optimization is basic with viewport meta tag but no responsive design elements. Accessibility and SEO are poor due to minimal content and lack of semantic structure. Hosting is via Sedo parking services, not a dedicated hosting provider. The technical debt is high as the site is not developed for active use.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with roadsafety.international. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review roadsafety.international.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.