Skip to main content

Security report for roadmaptozero.com

ZDHC Foundation · Manufacturing · N/a

Medium risk. 1 critical or high finding in SSL/TLS.

Security score

75/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The Roadmap to Zero website represents the ZDHC Foundation's initiative to promote sustainable chemical management within the fashion industry. It serves as a comprehensive resource hub offering standards, guidelines, training, and platforms to empower brands, suppliers, and manufacturers to produce safer products and reduce environmental impact. The site is well-positioned as a global leader in sustainable fashion chemical management, targeting industry stakeholders committed to environmental responsibility. Technically, the website is built on the Webflow CMS platform, utilizing modern web technologies such as Google Fonts, Swiper.js for interactive content, and Cloudflare Turnstile captcha for bot protection. The site demonstrates good mobile optimization and SEO practices, though some accessibility features could be enhanced. The integration of an AI chatbot indicates a commitment to user engagement and support. From a security perspective, the site employs HTTPS and bot protection mechanisms but lacks visible security headers and detailed security policies. The absence of WHOIS data for the domain raises some concerns about domain legitimacy, although the professional presentation and linkage to official ZDHC platforms mitigate this risk. Privacy compliance is addressed with cookie consent mechanisms and a privacy policy, but terms of service and incident response information are not evident. Overall, the website presents a trustworthy and professional front for the ZDHC Foundation's mission, with recommendations to improve security headers, domain transparency, and accessibility to further strengthen its posture.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
83/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

1 finding rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching roadmaptozero.com

This scan found 21 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
60
Email security
70
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
83
Average
75

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention roadmaptozero.com, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
567
Employees
0
Customers
567
Third parties
0
Weak passwords
11%

14 subdomains affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for roadmaptozero.com.

Select it in the checkout above.

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The ZDHC Foundation operates as a non-profit entity focused on transforming chemical management in the fashion supply chain. Its market positioning as a global leader is supported by a robust ecosystem of platforms, training programs, and community engagement initiatives. The business model revolves around providing standards (such as the MRSL), implementation guidance, and digital tools to suppliers and brands. Revenue streams likely include training accreditation, platform subscriptions, and event sponsorships. The target customer segments include fashion brands, suppliers, chemical formulators, and industry experts. Growth indicators include expanding platform offerings and regional events. The partnership ecosystem is extensive, linking to multiple official ZDHC platforms and allied organizations, enhancing credibility and reach.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate security maturity level with HTTPS enabled and bot protection via Cloudflare Turnstile captcha. However, the lack of visible security headers such as Content Security Policy (CSP), HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS), and X-Frame-Options reduces its defense-in-depth. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the analyzed content. Privacy compliance is partially addressed with cookie consent but lacks detailed incident response or vulnerability disclosure policies. The absence of WHOIS data for the domain is a notable gap in transparency and trust. Overall, the security posture is adequate for informational purposes but could be improved to meet higher compliance and security standards.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive security headers including CSP, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  2. Ensure domain WHOIS information is publicly available or provide justification for privacy protection to improve trustworthiness.
  3. Add a clearly accessible terms of service page and incident response contact information to improve compliance and user trust.
  4. Enhance website accessibility features to meet WCAG standards for broader user inclusivity.
  5. Regularly audit third-party scripts and integrations for vulnerabilities and update them to latest secure versions.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
ZDHC Foundation
Description
We need to change how things are produced, especially the items we wear. ZDHC is making that happen. We work with the fashion industry, empowering it to produce safe products. Together we are protecting the place we all call home.
Key services
ZDHC MRSL standards and updates, Implementation guidance and platforms, Training and certification via ZDHC Academy, Supplier and expert platforms, Events and community engagement, Supporting documents and resources
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Webflow CMS, Google Fonts (Ubuntu, Montserrat), Swiper.js for sliders, Cloudflare Turnstile captcha, Finsweet Cookie Consent (commented), Custom AI chatbot integration (Zeddy)
Platforms
Webflow
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • Use of Cloudflare Turnstile captcha for bot protection
  • Cookie consent banner with opt-in mechanism

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is professionally designed and well-structured.
  2. Content is focused on sustainable chemical management in fashion industry.
  3. Multiple official ZDHC platforms and resources are linked.
  4. No direct contact emails or phone numbers found on homepage.
  5. Cookie consent banner present with opt-in mechanism.
  6. No visible terms of service page detected.
  7. WHOIS data unavailable, raising some legitimacy questions.
  8. No WAF or blocking mechanisms detected.
  9. Use of modern web technologies and fonts.
  10. Presence of AI chatbot integration for user assistance.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using Webflow CMS, leveraging modern front-end technologies such as Google Fonts and Swiper.js for interactive sliders. Hosting appears to be via Webflow with Cloudflare CDN and security services. The site includes an AI chatbot integration for enhanced user interaction. Performance is moderate with good mobile responsiveness and SEO meta tags. However, accessibility features are basic and could be improved. The site uses Google Tag Manager for analytics and tracking. No major technical debt or outdated technologies were detected, indicating a well-maintained infrastructure with opportunities for security and accessibility enhancements.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with roadmaptozero.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review roadmaptozero.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.