a(a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
b(b) Incident handling: One indicator
c(c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
d(d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
e(e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
f(f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
g(g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
h(h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
i(i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
j(j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside
Partly checked
One indicator
Not visible from outside
This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.
GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.
Priority findings
5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.
Email security
SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.
Critical
No email authentication configured
Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing
What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately
Security headers
Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.
High
Missing Content-Security-Policy header
Controls resources the browser is allowed to load
What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application
This scan found 16 issues across 4 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.
Daily monitoring
Recommended
€25per month
TLS certificates and expiry
DNS records
SPF, DKIM and DMARC
Security headers
GDPR and NIS2 posture
Exposed services
Third-party trackers
Security score drift
Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.
Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.
Full report
€39.90one-time
The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
Email delivery with an unlock code
Lifetime access to this report
Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.
Results by check
Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.
How this score is calculated
The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.
Counted in this score
Security headers
65
Email security
60
DNS health
70
GDPR outside view
50
Average
61
Not counted
SSL/TLS: did not complete in this scan.
Network security: did not complete in this scan.
NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.
Findings that cap the score at 49
Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.
The certificate is not trusted by browsers
The website is not served over HTTPS
A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
The page loads a script from a compromised source
The domain registration has expired
SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain
Partial scans
When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.
Risk levels
Critical0–25
High26–49
Medium50–75
Low76–100
Breach exposure
Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.
Dark web exposure
Add-on
Leaked records that mention road-heroes.com, from OffSeq Breach.
No leaked records found
Breach holds no records for road-heroes.com right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.
Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.
Business context
Business profile
The platform operates in the transportation sector with a social impact and non-profit orientation, focusing on mobility workers in South Korea. It leverages partnerships with Kakao Mobility and related social organizations to build credibility and reach. The business model centers on community engagement and recognition rather than direct revenue generation. The site’s content and structure support brand consistency and trust, though it lacks explicit contact details and formal policies. Growth potential lies in expanding community participation and formalizing compliance and security frameworks.
Security posture
The security posture is moderate. HTTPS is used, and domain transfer protections are in place, but DNSSEC is not enabled, and no security headers were detected, which are critical for preventing common web attacks. The absence of privacy and cookie policies, incident response contacts, and vulnerability disclosure mechanisms indicates compliance gaps. No vulnerable libraries or exposed sensitive data were identified. The site should implement security headers (CSP, HSTS, X-Frame-Options), enable DNSSEC, and publish clear privacy and security policies to improve its security maturity and regulatory compliance.
Recommendations
Enable DNSSEC on the domain to enhance DNS security and prevent spoofing.
Implement standard security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, Strict-Transport-Security, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
Publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with GDPR compliance indicators and implement a cookie consent mechanism.
Add clear contact information including security incident response contacts (e.g., security@ or abuse@ emails).
Regularly audit and update third-party libraries and frameworks to mitigate vulnerabilities.
Site observations
Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.
Business
Company
카카오모빌리티 상생재단
Description
도로 위에서 선한 영향력을 끼친 모빌리티 종사자들을 소개하고 추천하는 플랫폼으로, 카카오모빌리티 상생재단이 함께 운영합니다.
Key services
히어로즈 추천 및 소개, 역대 수상자 정보 제공, 활동 및 소식 공유
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent
Technology
Stack
Vue.js, Axios, Vuelidate, Bluebird, OnionCMS
Frameworks
Vue.js
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good
Security
Observed score
65/100
Good practices seen
HTTPS usage implied by URL
ClientTransferProhibited domain status
Analytics and tracking
Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor
Advertising
Transparency
poor
Site quality
Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate
Key observations
Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
Content is primarily in Korean and focuses on social recognition of mobility heroes.
No explicit privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found on the main page.
No contact emails or phone numbers explicitly provided on the homepage.
Use of modern JavaScript frameworks (Vue.js) and CMS (OnionCMS).
External links point to reputable partner organizations related to Kakao Mobility and social impact.
No visible analytics or advertising/tracking scripts detected.
No security headers detected in provided data; DNSSEC not enabled.
Domain registration is consistent and not privacy protected, indicating transparency.
Standards and sources
Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.
Reviews of this site
Share your experience with road-heroes.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.
Community rating
No published reviews yet. Be the first to review road-heroes.com.