Skip to main content

Security report for rldatixgc.com

RLDatix Government & Commercial · Government · N/a

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in Email security, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

58/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

RLDatix Government & Commercial operates a professional website offering advanced workforce management and transport solutions tailored for government and commercial sectors. The company positions itself as a strategic partner for organizations facing complex operational challenges, providing software products such as OneView, Flexiroute, HRCase, and Expenses. The website demonstrates a mature digital presence with modern technologies, strong SEO, and user-friendly design optimized for mobile devices. Privacy compliance is well addressed through a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie consent mechanisms. However, the absence of WHOIS registration data and lack of direct contact emails or phone numbers slightly diminish the overall trustworthiness from a domain registration and business transparency perspective. Security posture is strong with HTTPS, security headers, and no visible vulnerabilities, but incident response and security policy disclosures are missing. Overall, the website reflects a credible and professional business with room for improvement in transparency and security communication.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
73/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  3. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching rldatixgc.com

This scan found 27 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
52
Security headers
15
Email security
40
DNS health
70
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
73
Average
58

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company targets government and commercial organizations requiring workforce and transport management solutions, focusing on sectors like Defence, Maritime, Offshore Engineering, Law Enforcement, and Transport. Their business model revolves around providing SaaS software solutions that enhance operational efficiency, compliance, and cost reduction. The presence of customer testimonials and case studies indicates a well-established market position and customer base. The company leverages partnerships and sister sites within the RLDatix brand ecosystem, enhancing its market reach. Growth indicators include active content marketing, webinars, and resource sharing. The lack of explicit company registration details and direct contact information suggests a potential area for business credibility enhancement.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS with strong SSL configuration and implements key security headers, indicating a solid baseline security posture. Cookie consent is managed via Osano, supporting GDPR compliance. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the HTML content. However, the absence of published security policies, incident response contacts, or vulnerability disclosure mechanisms limits transparency and readiness perception. The use of multiple third-party analytics and marketing tools introduces a moderate tracking footprint, balanced by user consent mechanisms. Recommendations include publishing security policies, incident response contacts, and a vulnerability disclosure program to strengthen security culture and trust.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a dedicated security policy and incident response page including contact information.
  2. Add a vulnerability disclosure or security.txt file to facilitate responsible reporting.
  3. Include direct company contact emails and phone numbers on the website for transparency.
  4. Create and publish a terms of service page to clarify user and customer agreements.
  5. Regularly review and audit third-party scripts and tracking tools to minimize security risks.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
RLDatix Government & Commercial
Description
RLDatix Government & Commercial provides workforce management and transport software solutions designed to streamline operations and compliance for organizations with complex challenges, targeting sectors such as Defence, Maritime, Offshore Engineering, Law Enforcement, and Transport.
Key services
OneView - Strategic Workforce Management, Flexiroute - Home to School Transport Management, HRCase - Employee Relations Case Management, Expenses - Expense Management Software
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Yoast SEO, jQuery, Bootstrap, Flickity slider, HubSpot forms and scripts, Google Tag Manager, Osano cookie consent
Frameworks
Bootstrap
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
excellent

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent implemented
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of security headers

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics (via GTM), Dreamdata Analytics, HubSpot Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Dreamdata Analytics, HubSpot Analytics
Marketing tools
HubSpot, Osano Cookie Consent
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. Content is professionally presented with clear navigation and rich media.
  3. Strong focus on workforce and transport management solutions for government and commercial sectors.
  4. Privacy and cookie policies are implemented with user consent mechanisms.
  5. No explicit terms of service or security policy pages found.
  6. WHOIS data is missing or unavailable, which is unusual for a commercial domain.
  7. Multiple third-party marketing and analytics tools are used, with cookie consent.
  8. No direct company contact emails or phone numbers found on homepage; contact via form only.
  9. Social media presence includes Twitter and LinkedIn.
  10. Website uses modern technologies and CMS (WordPress) with good SEO and accessibility.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS with a modern tech stack including Bootstrap for responsive design, Flickity for sliders, and HubSpot for marketing and forms. It is hosted likely on WP Engine, ensuring reliable performance. SEO is well implemented with Yoast SEO plugin and structured data (JSON-LD) for enhanced search visibility. Accessibility features are present, and mobile optimization is excellent. Performance is moderate, with room for optimization in script loading and caching. The technical infrastructure supports a professional and scalable digital presence but should maintain vigilance on third-party dependencies and performance tuning.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with rldatixgc.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review rldatixgc.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.