Skip to main content

Security report for rjelinek.sk

RUDOLF JELÍNEK a.s. · Other · Czech Republic

High risk. 9 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

46/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Rudolf Jelínek is a well-established producer of premium fruit distillates, especially known for its slivovica, with a heritage dating back to the 16th century and formal company founding in 1894. The company operates in the Czech Republic and Slovakia, offering a broad portfolio of fruit spirits, visitor experiences, and e-commerce sales. The website reflects a mature digital presence built on WordPress with modern plugins and tracking technologies. Security posture is good with HTTPS and DNSSEC enabled, and age verification mechanisms are in place to comply with alcohol regulations. However, the site lacks explicit privacy and terms of service policies, which are important for GDPR compliance and user trust. Overall, the domain registration data supports the legitimacy and long history of the business.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

9 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching rjelinek.sk

This scan found 26 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
20
Email security
70
DNS health
80
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
25
Average
46

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company holds a strong market position as a traditional and premium fruit distillate producer with international export activities, including kosher products and limited editions. Its business model combines manufacturing, retail, visitor engagement, and online sales. The presence of subsidiaries and sister domains indicates a structured brand ecosystem. The target audience is mature adults interested in quality spirits. The company leverages social media and digital marketing effectively, though privacy compliance could be improved.

Security posture

The website uses HTTPS with DNSSEC, indicating good baseline security. Age verification scripts are implemented to restrict access to minors. However, there is no visible security policy, incident response contact, or vulnerability disclosure mechanism, which are recommended best practices. Tracking scripts from Google and Facebook are present, requiring clear cookie consent. No critical vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. Security headers beyond DNSSEC and HTTPS are not explicitly visible in the provided data.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service to improve legal compliance and user trust.
  2. Add a security policy and incident response contact information to enhance transparency and readiness.
  3. Implement a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting.
  4. Enhance accessibility features to improve usability for all users.
  5. Regularly review and update third-party scripts and plugins to mitigate potential vulnerabilities.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
RUDOLF JELÍNEK a.s.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
RUDOLF JELÍNEK a.s.
Description
Rudolf Jelínek is a company producing high-quality fruit distillates, especially slivovica (plum brandy), with a tradition dating back to the 16th century in the Valašsko region. They also produce other fruit spirits such as pear, apricot, cherry, and apple distillates. The company operates visitor centers, museums, and offers tours. They have a portfolio including kosher products, limited editions, and distribution services.
Key services
Production of fruit distillates and spirits, Visitor centers and museum experiences, E-commerce sales via online shop, Export and distribution
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, WooCommerce, WPBakery Page Builder, Slider Revolution, Google Fonts, jQuery, Isotope, Flickity Carousel
Frameworks
WordPress
Platforms
Web
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • DNSSEC enabled
  • Age verification for alcohol content

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Ad networks
Adform
Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel
Marketing tools
Google Fonts, Slider Revolution, WPBakery Page Builder
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is professionally designed and content-rich.
  2. Strong brand presence with consistent branding and social media integration.
  3. Good use of modern web technologies and CMS.
  4. Lacks explicit privacy policy and terms of service pages.
  5. Implements age verification for alcohol-related content.
  6. No visible security.txt or incident response information.
  7. WHOIS data supports legitimacy and long-term operation.
  8. Uses multiple tracking and advertising services with cookie consent.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS using WooCommerce for e-commerce functionality, WPBakery Page Builder for layout, and Slider Revolution for interactive content. It uses modern JavaScript libraries like jQuery and Isotope for UI enhancements. Google Fonts and multiple tracking scripts are integrated. The site is mobile optimized with responsive design and good SEO metadata including JSON-LD structured data. Performance is moderate, with caching and minified CSS assets observed. Hosting provider details are not explicit. Technical debt appears low but could benefit from improved accessibility and privacy compliance features.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with rjelinek.sk. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review rjelinek.sk.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.