Skip to main content

Security report for risque-prevention-incendie.fr

Government · France

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

55/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website www.risque-prevention-incendie.fr functions as an informational portal providing access maps and data related to forest massif access in Mediterranean departments of France. It is a government-related service in partnership with Météo France and Valabre, aimed at supporting fire prevention and public information. The site offers interactive maps embedded via iframe and department-specific links to forest access information. Technically, the site is built with basic HTML and CSS, with no detected CMS or advanced frameworks. Mobile optimization and accessibility are basic but functional. Security posture is limited, with no HTTPS verification in the provided data, no security headers, and no privacy or cookie policies, which are critical for compliance and trust. WHOIS data is unavailable, which reduces domain trustworthiness, though the content and external partner references suggest legitimacy. Overall, the site is functional and serves its informational purpose but requires improvements in security, privacy compliance, and contact transparency to enhance trust and compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching risque-prevention-incendie.fr

This scan found 28 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
15
Email security
70
DNS health
60
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
25
Average
55

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention risque-prevention-incendie.fr, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for risque-prevention-incendie.fr right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The website targets government officials, emergency services, and the general public interested in forest fire prevention and access in Mediterranean France. It operates as a niche public sector informational platform supported by partnerships with Météo France and Valabre. The business model is non-commercial, focusing on public safety and information dissemination. The site’s market position is specialized and essential for regional fire prevention efforts. There is no evidence of revenue streams or commercial activities. The partnership ecosystem is strong with recognized public entities. Growth indicators or parent/subsidiary relationships are not evident. The site’s operations appear stable but limited in scope and scale.

Security posture

The security maturity of the website is low to moderate. The absence of HTTPS confirmation in the data is a critical concern, as is the lack of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy or X-Frame-Options. No forms or input fields are present to assess input sanitization or secure data handling. No incident response or security policy information is provided. The site does not display GDPR compliance elements such as privacy or cookie policies. No vulnerability disclosures or security.txt files are found. The lack of WHOIS data further reduces trust. Overall, the site is vulnerable to basic security and compliance gaps that should be addressed to protect users and data integrity.

Recommendations

  1. Implement HTTPS with a valid SSL/TLS certificate and verify configuration.
  2. Add standard security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  3. Publish clear privacy and cookie policies to comply with GDPR and inform users.
  4. Provide contact information including emails and phone numbers for user support and incident reporting.
  5. Consider adding a security policy and incident response contact details to improve transparency and readiness.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Description
The website provides access information and maps for forest massif access in Mediterranean departments of France, in partnership with Météo France and Valabre. It serves as an informational portal for prefectures to display forest access levels.
Key services
Interactive maps of forest massif access, Department-specific forest access information, Partnership with meteorological and fire prevention organizations
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
HTML5, CSS3, iframe embedding
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
40/100

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website serves as a government informational portal for forest massif access in Mediterranean France.
  2. No WHOIS data available, limiting domain trust verification.
  3. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found on the site.
  4. No contact emails, phone numbers, or social media links present.
  5. No security headers or advanced security measures detected.
  6. Site uses iframe to embed interactive maps from a partner domain.
  7. No advertising or tracking technologies detected.
  8. Content is safe and suitable for general audiences.
  9. Mobile optimization and accessibility are basic but functional.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses straightforward HTML and CSS with no detected JavaScript frameworks or CMS platforms. It embeds interactive map content via iframe from a partner domain. Performance is moderate with no heavy scripts detected. Mobile responsiveness is basic but present via CSS media queries. SEO optimization is minimal with only a title tag and no meta description or Open Graph tags. Accessibility features are limited, with no ARIA attributes or landmarks detected. The site could benefit from modernization including responsive design improvements, SEO enhancements, and accessibility compliance. Hosting provider and infrastructure details are not discernible from the content.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with risque-prevention-incendie.fr. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review risque-prevention-incendie.fr.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.