Skip to main content

Security report for riskified.com

Riskified · E-commerce · N/a

Low risk. 4 critical or high findings in Security headers and GDPR outside view.

Security score

80/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Riskified operates a leading AI-powered ecommerce fraud prevention and risk intelligence platform trusted by global merchants to maximize revenue and reduce fraud-related losses. The company offers a suite of products including Adaptive Checkout, Chargeback Guarantee, Policy Protect, Dispute Resolve, and Account Secure, targeting ecommerce enterprises seeking accountable fraud management solutions. The website demonstrates a mature digital presence with professional design, multi-language support, and comprehensive content including case studies, testimonials, and industry awards. Technically, the site is built on WordPress with modern analytics and marketing tools integrated, delivering fast performance and good accessibility. Security posture is strong with HTTPS, security headers, and no visible vulnerabilities, though explicit security policies and incident response contacts are not published. WHOIS data is missing or unavailable, which is unusual but does not detract significantly from the overall trustworthiness given the professional web presence and business signals. Overall, Riskified presents as a credible, enterprise-grade ecommerce fraud prevention provider with a robust online presence and solid technical foundation.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
53/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching riskified.com

This scan found 15 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
100
Security headers
55
Email security
85
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
53
Average
80

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Riskified is positioned as a key player in the ecommerce fraud prevention market, leveraging AI and machine learning to deliver scalable fraud detection and chargeback protection. Their business model focuses on B2B SaaS solutions with performance guarantees, appealing to large ecommerce merchants across multiple sectors including retail, luxury fashion, travel, digital goods, and athletic/outdoors. The company emphasizes measurable ROI and operational efficiency gains for clients, supported by independent studies and customer testimonials. Their ecosystem includes investor relations and support portals, as well as localized sites for international markets. The presence of multiple industry awards and recognitions further strengthens their market credibility. Strategic partnerships and integrations with major analytics and marketing platforms enhance their service delivery and customer engagement.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS and implements key security headers, indicating a strong baseline security posture. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the HTML content. However, the absence of a published security policy, incident response plan, or vulnerability disclosure program limits transparency and may impact trust for security-conscious clients. No direct security contact emails or abuse channels were found. The site uses reputable third-party services for analytics and marketing, which appear properly integrated. Overall, the security posture is good but could be improved by publishing explicit security governance documents and providing clear incident response contacts.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a dedicated security policy page outlining security practices and compliance frameworks.
  2. Implement and publicize a vulnerability disclosure program or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting.
  3. Provide explicit incident response contact channels such as security@ or abuse@ email addresses.
  4. Enhance WHOIS transparency by ensuring domain registration data is complete and publicly available.
  5. Maintain and update privacy and cookie policies to reflect evolving regulations and user expectations.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Riskified
Description
Leading global ecommerce enterprises leverage Riskified's AI-powered fraud and risk intelligence platform for chargeback guarantee, to grow revenues, fraud prevention and policy abuse at scale.
Key services
Adaptive Checkout, Chargeback Guarantee, Policy Protect, Dispute Resolve, Account Secure
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, jQuery, Google Tag Manager, HubSpot, Hotjar, Cloudinary, PWA
Frameworks
WordPress
Platforms
Cloudflare (likely for CDN and security)
Performance
fast
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
excellent

Security

Observed score
90/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of security headers
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Secure forms with proper input fields

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Hotjar, HubSpot
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Google Tag Manager, HubSpot, Hotjar
Tracking pixels
Hotjar, HubSpot
Marketing tools
HubSpot, Mutiny
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and multimedia
  2. Strong focus on ecommerce fraud prevention and risk management
  3. Multiple customer testimonials and case studies present
  4. Comprehensive product and resource offerings
  5. Multi-language support available
  6. Use of modern web technologies and analytics
  7. No direct contact emails or phone numbers found on main pages
  8. Security policies and terms are present but no explicit security contact
  9. WHOIS data missing or unavailable, which is unusual
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS with a modern tech stack including jQuery, Google Tag Manager, HubSpot, Hotjar, and Cloudinary for media delivery. It employs a progressive web app (PWA) approach for enhanced user experience. The site is mobile-optimized with responsive design and accessibility features. SEO is well implemented with comprehensive meta tags, Open Graph, and JSON-LD structured data. Performance appears fast with CDN usage and asynchronous script loading. No technical debt or deprecated libraries were observed. Opportunities exist to further modernize by adopting newer JavaScript frameworks or enhancing security headers with additional policies.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 80/100 +12Low23 findingsView report
  2. 68/100Medium24 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with riskified.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review riskified.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.