Skip to main content

Security report for riskcompliance.cz

Risk & Compliance Platform Europe · Government · Czech Republic

Partial score · DNS & email only

55/100

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Risk & Compliance Platform Europe is a specialized content and educational platform focused on European regulatory, compliance, and risk management topics. It offers news, whitepapers, educational events, books, and job listings primarily targeting compliance professionals and regulatory stakeholders in Europe. The website is multilingual with sister sites for various European countries, indicating a regional market focus. Technically, the site is built on WordPress with modern web technologies including jQuery, Bootstrap, Google Analytics, and Facebook SDK, providing a moderate to good user experience with mobile responsiveness and SEO optimization. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS and reCAPTCHA usage, but lacks some security headers and explicit cookie consent mechanisms. The absence of WHOIS data limits domain trust verification, but the professional content and active updates suggest legitimate operation. Overall, the site is a credible resource for compliance professionals with room for improvement in privacy and security transparency.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
33/ 100 · High
Checks completed
6of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • High

      High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP

      Port 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer

      What to do: Consider restricting access to FTP or implementing strong authentication

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching riskcompliance.cz

This scan found 18 issues across 5 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
85
Email security
55
DNS health
80
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
33
Average
55

Not counted

  • Security headers: did not complete in this scan.
  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The platform occupies a niche market in European compliance and risk management information dissemination. Its multilingual approach and partnerships indicate a strategy to serve diverse European markets. Revenue likely derives from educational events, whitepaper downloads, and job board listings. The content is professionally curated, targeting corporate governance, legal, and compliance professionals. The partnership with entities like pont.media and complianter.eu suggests collaboration with related service providers. The lack of direct contact emails or phone numbers may indicate a focus on digital engagement through forms and online content. The platform's market position is stable within its niche but could benefit from enhanced transparency and expanded contact options.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate security maturity level with enforced HTTPS, use of Google reCAPTCHA on forms, and no visible exposure of sensitive data. However, it lacks important security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options, which are recommended to mitigate common web vulnerabilities. There is no visible incident response or vulnerability disclosure policy, which could hinder effective security incident management. The absence of a cookie consent mechanism despite tracking scripts raises privacy compliance concerns under GDPR. Overall, while basic security practices are in place, enhancements are needed to align with best practices and regulatory requirements.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  2. Introduce a clear cookie policy and consent mechanism to comply with GDPR and improve user privacy transparency.
  3. Publish an incident response and vulnerability disclosure policy to demonstrate security readiness and encourage responsible reporting.
  4. Provide direct company contact information such as verified emails and phone numbers to improve business credibility and user trust.
  5. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts and plugins to minimize vulnerabilities and ensure compliance with privacy regulations.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Risk & Compliance Platform Europe
Description
Risk & Compliance Platform Europe provides news, whitepapers, education, events, books, and job listings focused on risk management, compliance, and regulatory affairs primarily in Europe.
Key services
News and updates on regulatory and compliance issues, Whitepapers and research publications, Educational courses and events, Job listings in compliance and risk sectors, Knowledge base articles
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery, Google Analytics, Facebook SDK, Google reCAPTCHA, Yoast SEO
Frameworks
Bootstrap
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of Google reCAPTCHA on forms
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Ad networks
ShareThis
Tracking pixels
Facebook SDK
Marketing tools
Simple Share Buttons Adder
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content in Czech language.
  2. Content focuses on European regulatory news, compliance, and risk management.
  3. Multiple language versions exist for other European countries.
  4. No direct company contact emails or phone numbers found; contact is via form.
  5. No explicit cookie consent banner detected despite use of tracking scripts.
  6. No visible security.txt or vulnerability disclosure information.
  7. WHOIS data is missing, limiting domain trust verification.
  8. Use of modern web technologies and SEO plugins.
  9. Social media presence includes Facebook and Twitter links.
  10. No signs of adult or questionable content.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS with a child theme and uses Bootstrap for responsive design. It incorporates jQuery and Google Analytics for interactivity and tracking, along with Facebook SDK for social media integration. The site loads multiple external resources from trusted CDNs and uses Google reCAPTCHA for form protection. Performance is moderate with room for optimization, especially in accessibility and security header implementation. SEO is enhanced by Yoast SEO plugin, and the site includes structured data (JSON-LD) for improved search engine understanding. The technical stack is modern but could benefit from enhanced security configurations and privacy compliance features.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with riskcompliance.cz. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review riskcompliance.cz.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.