Skip to main content

Security report for ripperpokies.com

Other · Denmark

Medium risk. 9 critical or high findings in Email security, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

59/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Ripper Casino operates as an online gambling platform offering a variety of casino games to adult users. The website's content and branding focus on providing a simple and engaging gambling experience. The domain is relatively new, registered in 2021, which aligns with a startup or recently launched online casino business. The technical infrastructure includes Matomo analytics for tracking and Kameleoon for marketing optimization, hosted behind Cloudflare DNS services. However, the site lacks visible privacy, cookie, and terms of service policies, which are critical for compliance and user trust in the gambling industry. Security measures such as DNSSEC and security headers are absent, indicating room for improvement in protecting user data and site integrity.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

9 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

  3. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching ripperpokies.com

This scan found 25 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
57
Security headers
45
Email security
40
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
35
Average
59

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The business targets the online gambling market, focusing on casino games for adult audiences. The business model likely revolves around user engagement and betting revenue. The lack of explicit contact information and regulatory disclosures may hinder trust and compliance with gambling regulations. The use of advanced marketing tools like Kameleoon suggests an intent to optimize user conversion and retention. The domain registration is consistent with a legitimate registrar but lacks detailed ownership information, which is common in gambling sites but may raise concerns for some users and regulators.

Security posture

The security posture is moderate but incomplete. HTTPS is implied but not explicitly confirmed in the data. The absence of DNSSEC and security headers reduces the overall security level. No evidence of exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries was found, but the lack of privacy and cookie policies indicates compliance gaps. The site uses tracking technologies extensively, which may raise privacy concerns. Incident response and security policy information are not present, suggesting limited transparency in security governance.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and prominently display comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with GDPR compliance.
  2. Enable DNSSEC for the domain to enhance DNS security.
  3. Add essential security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and HSTS.
  4. Provide clear contact information including support and incident response channels.
  5. Conduct a security audit to identify and remediate potential vulnerabilities and improve compliance.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Description
All your favourite games. All in one place. "Ripper Casino" is a super simple space that's jam-packed full of good vibes and great opportunities. PLAY NOW!
Key services
online casino games, gambling
Content quality
basic
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
Matomo Analytics, Kameleoon, Cloudflare DNS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
50/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled (implied by URL https://)
  • No DNSSEC enabled

Analytics and tracking

Services
Matomo
Tracking level
extensive
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Matomo, Kameleoon, HeatmapSessionRecording
Marketing tools
Kameleoon
Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
basic
User experience
basic
Content relevance
basic
Navigation
basic
Professionalism
basic
Trustworthiness
low

Key observations

  1. Website is an online casino platform targeting adult users.
  2. No visible privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found in the provided content.
  3. No contact information such as emails or phone numbers found.
  4. Uses Matomo analytics and Kameleoon for tracking and marketing.
  5. No DNSSEC enabled for domain, which is a security weakness.
  6. No security headers detected in the provided data.
  7. Content is primarily gambling related, requiring adult audience.
  8. Domain registration is recent but consistent with business type.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses modern JavaScript-based tracking and marketing tools, including Matomo and Kameleoon, indicating a focus on analytics and user experience optimization. Hosting appears to leverage Cloudflare DNS services, but no CMS or backend platform was identified. The site shows basic mobile optimization and SEO practices but lacks advanced accessibility features. Performance is moderate with asynchronous script loading. The absence of DNSSEC and security headers suggests technical debt in security implementation.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with ripperpokies.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review ripperpokies.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.