Skip to main content

Security report for rimplas.co.uk

Rimplas Technologies Ltd · Manufacturing · United Kingdom

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in SSL/TLS, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

67/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Rimplas Technologies Ltd is a UK-based manufacturing company specializing in rigid Polyurethane (PU) Foam mouldings, Structural Foam mouldings, and Injection moulding. Established in 1987, the company positions itself as the only UK supplier offering these combined services from a single, well-equipped facility. Their business model focuses on B2B partnerships with multinational companies and innovative startups, emphasizing technical design support and consistent quality delivery. The company holds ISO 9001 and ISO 14001 certifications, underscoring their commitment to quality and environmental management. The website reflects a professional and consistent brand image targeting industrial and manufacturing clients. Technically, the website is built on WordPress with modern SEO practices using Yoast SEO and performance optimizations such as lazy loading images and responsive design. The presence of tracking tools like CANDDi indicates moderate user analytics capabilities. While the site performs moderately well, some lazy load images report errors, and no explicit security headers were detected in the provided data. The site is accessible without WAF or blocking mechanisms, indicating good availability. From a security perspective, the site uses HTTPS with good SSL configuration but lacks visible security headers and a cookie consent mechanism, which may impact GDPR compliance. The WHOIS lookup failed due to domain naming rules violations, preventing verification of domain registration details, which lowers the domain legitimacy confidence. However, the website content and business information appear credible and professional. Overall, the website scores well in content quality, business credibility, and technical implementation but has room for improvement in privacy compliance and security posture. Strategic recommendations include implementing security headers, fixing lazy load image errors, adding cookie consent, and verifying domain registration details to …

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
53/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1
    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  3. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching rimplas.co.uk

This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
54
Security headers
65
Email security
70
DNS health
60
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
53
Average
67

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Rimplas Technologies operates in the manufacturing sector with a unique market position as the sole UK supplier combining polyurethane foam, structural foam, and injection moulding services under one roof. Their competitive advantage lies in their ISO certifications, long-standing industry experience since 1987, and strong partnerships with toolmakers and clients. The business model is focused on B2B manufacturing services targeting industrial clients requiring high-quality moulded components. Revenue streams likely derive from manufacturing contracts, assembly, finishing, and technical consultancy. Growth indicators include investment in computer-controlled equipment and partnerships with multinational and startup companies. The company maintains a professional online presence with clear contact information and downloadable brochures, supporting customer engagement and lead generation.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate security maturity level with HTTPS enforced and no exposed sensitive data in the HTML content. However, the absence of explicit security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options reduces the overall security posture. The lack of a cookie consent mechanism and security.txt or vulnerability disclosure pages indicates gaps in privacy compliance and incident response readiness. The use of third-party tracking (CANDDi) suggests moderate user tracking, which should be managed carefully for GDPR compliance. The WHOIS failure to provide domain registration details is a concern for domain legitimacy verification. Overall, while no critical vulnerabilities are evident, improvements in security headers, privacy mechanisms, and domain verification are recommended to strengthen security culture and compliance.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-XSS-Protection.
  2. Fix lazy load image errors to ensure all images load correctly and improve user experience.
  3. Add a cookie consent banner/mechanism to comply with GDPR and enhance privacy transparency.
  4. Publish a security.txt file and vulnerability disclosure policy to improve incident response readiness.
  5. Verify and update domain registration details to resolve WHOIS inconsistencies and improve domain legitimacy trust.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
R.I.M Plastics Technology Ltd
Registration number
2073596
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Rimplas Technologies Ltd
Description
The only UK supplier offering rigid Polyurethane (PU) Foam mouldings, Structural Foam mouldings and Injection mouldings. ISO 9001 registered.
Key services
Polyurethane moulding, Engineered structural foam moulding, Injection moulding, Painting & finishing, Assembly
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Yoast SEO plugin, jQuery, Slick Carousel, Perfmatters Lazy Load, Origin Theme, CANDDi tracking
Platforms
WordPress CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of security plugins (implied by WordPress environment)

Analytics and tracking

Services
CANDDi
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
CANDDi
Marketing tools
CANDDi
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and structured data.
  2. No WAF or security blocking detected.
  3. WHOIS data unavailable due to domain naming rules violation error.
  4. Website uses WordPress CMS with modern SEO and lazy loading techniques.
  5. Contact information is clearly presented with phone, email, and physical address.
  6. ISO certifications are prominently displayed, enhancing trust.
  7. Some lazy load images report error status, indicating possible broken images.
  8. No cookie consent banner detected, which may impact GDPR compliance.
  9. No explicit security headers detected in provided data.
  10. Tracking via CANDDi is present, indicating moderate user tracking.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS using the Origin Theme and enhanced with plugins such as Yoast SEO for search engine optimization and Perfmatters for lazy loading images. It uses jQuery and Slick Carousel for interactive elements. The site loads external resources from trusted CDNs like jsDelivr and Google Fonts. Performance is moderate with some lazy load image errors noted, which could impact page load and user experience. Mobile optimization is good with responsive design elements. Accessibility is basic but could be improved. No hosting provider details were detected from the data. The technical stack is modern but would benefit from enhanced security configurations and performance tuning to reduce technical debt and risks.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with rimplas.co.uk. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review rimplas.co.uk.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.