Skip to main content

Security report for rilanos.lv

Other · Latvia

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

63/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website www.rilanos.lv is a small business site hosted on the Wix platform, targeting a Latvian audience. The site uses standard Wix technologies and includes Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager for visitor tracking. However, the site lacks critical business information such as contact details, privacy policies, and terms of service, which limits its credibility and user trust. The absence of WHOIS data due to query limits prevents a full domain registration analysis, but the site content and hosting provider suggest a legitimate small business presence. Technically, the site is built with modern web technologies provided by Wix, ensuring moderate performance and good mobile optimization. However, the site lacks advanced SEO and accessibility features, and no security headers were detected, which could be improved to enhance security posture. HTTPS is enabled, providing basic encryption. From a security perspective, the site shows no signs of blocking or WAF interference, and no vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were found. The lack of privacy and cookie policies, as well as contact information for incident response, indicates gaps in compliance and security transparency. Overall, the site has a moderate security posture but requires improvements in privacy compliance and security best practices. The overall risk assessment suggests that while the site is likely legitimate and safe for general users, it would benefit from adding comprehensive privacy and security policies, contact information, and improved technical security measures to enhance trust and compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching rilanos.lv

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
35
Email security
70
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
25
Average
63

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The business behind www.rilanos.lv appears to be a small Latvian entity with limited online presence beyond this Wix-hosted website. The lack of detailed business descriptions, contact information, and certifications limits insights into market positioning and business model. The use of Wix suggests a focus on ease of deployment rather than custom enterprise solutions. The site targets a general Latvian audience but does not clearly define its services or products online. There are no visible partnerships or subsidiaries linked from the site. The business likely operates in a local or niche market segment with basic digital marketing tools in place.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a basic security posture with HTTPS enabled and some cookie handling restrictions implemented via JavaScript. However, the absence of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options reduces protection against common web attacks. No incident response or security contact information is provided, which is a compliance gap. The use of third-party analytics introduces moderate user tracking without clear privacy disclosures. No vulnerabilities or malware indicators were detected in the analyzed content. The site would benefit from implementing security headers, publishing privacy and cookie policies, and providing security contact channels to improve its security maturity and compliance.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie policy to comply with GDPR and enhance user trust.
  2. Add security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to improve protection against web attacks.
  3. Provide clear contact information including business emails and phone numbers to improve business credibility and support.
  4. Establish an incident response contact channel (e.g., security@ or abuse@ email) to handle security issues effectively.
  5. Enhance SEO and accessibility features to improve site visibility and user experience.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Content quality
basic
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
Wix, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, core-js, focus-within-polyfill
Platforms
Wix
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
60/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Cookie handling with restrictions on certain cookies

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
basic
User experience
basic
Content relevance
basic
Navigation
basic
Professionalism
basic
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is built on Wix platform with standard Wix scripts and assets.
  2. No WHOIS data available due to query limit error; domain registration details unknown.
  3. No privacy policy, cookie policy, or terms of service detected on the site.
  4. No contact emails, phone numbers, or physical addresses found in the content.
  5. Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager are used for tracking.
  6. No security headers detected in the provided data; HTTPS is enabled.
  7. No signs of WAF or content blocking; site content is accessible and normal.
  8. Content is minimal and mostly technical with no clear business description or contact info.
  9. No social media links or business certifications found.
  10. No forms detected in the provided HTML content.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on the Wix platform, leveraging Wix's content delivery network and standard JavaScript libraries including core-js and polyfills for browser compatibility. Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager are integrated for visitor tracking. The site uses HTTPS, ensuring encrypted communication. Performance is moderate, with standard Wix optimizations and mobile responsiveness. However, the site lacks advanced SEO metadata and structured data, limiting search engine visibility. Accessibility features are basic, and no ARIA roles or landmarks were detected in the provided content. The absence of security headers and privacy policies indicates technical debt in security and compliance areas. Overall, the technical infrastructure is stable but could be improved with enhanced security and SEO practices.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with rilanos.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review rilanos.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.