Skip to main content

Security report for rigit.se

Rolf Granlund (personal site) · Other · Sweden

Partial score · DNS & email only

46/100

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website 'RIGIT.SE – Blandat Svamlat' is a personal blog and information site maintained by Rolf Granlund, a former IT consultant and author specializing in Microsoft Office and SharePoint technologies. The site serves a niche audience interested in technology, personal insights, and related topics. It is hosted on WordPress.com, leveraging modern web technologies such as the Gutenberg editor and Jetpack plugins, ensuring a stable and moderately performant platform. Security posture is strong due to WordPress.com's managed HTTPS and security headers, though explicit privacy and cookie policies are absent, which is a compliance gap. Contact information is available, primarily via a personal Gmail address and Twitter handle, supporting user engagement. Overall, the site is trustworthy and professionally maintained for a personal blog, but lacks formal business and security policy disclosures.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
8/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
6of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • Critical

      No HTTPS encryption

      GDPR requires appropriate security measures for personal data

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate for HTTPS

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  2. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Critical

      No HTTPS Encryption

      Website does not use HTTPS encryption, making all data transmission vulnerable to interception

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate and redirect all HTTP traffic to HTTPS

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching rigit.se

This scan found 17 issues across 5 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
0
Email security
60
DNS health
60
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
8
Average
46

Not counted

  • Security headers: did not complete in this scan.
  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention rigit.se, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for rigit.se right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The site positions itself as a personal brand platform for Rolf Granlund, highlighting his expertise and history in IT consulting and authorship. The business model is non-commercial, focusing on content sharing and community interaction through blog posts and comments. The site links to several partner blogs and media outlets, indicating a modest ecosystem of related content. The target audience includes technology enthusiasts and followers of the author's work. The domain age and registrant information align with the site's history, reinforcing legitimacy. No corporate or commercial business registrations are evident, consistent with a personal blog.

Security posture

Security measures are primarily inherited from the WordPress.com hosting environment, which provides HTTPS, security headers, and managed infrastructure. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the content. However, the absence of explicit security policies, incident response contacts, and vulnerability disclosure mechanisms indicates room for improvement in security governance. Forms on the site are standard WordPress comment forms with no advanced security features noted. Overall, the security posture is adequate for a personal blog but lacks formalized security documentation.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a clear privacy policy and cookie policy to improve GDPR compliance.
  2. Implement a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to enhance transparency.
  3. Add incident response contact information for security issues.
  4. Enhance accessibility features to improve user experience for all visitors.
  5. Consider adding structured data for business information if commercial activities are introduced.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Rolf Granlund (personal site)
Description
Personal website of Rolf Granlund, author and former IT consultant focused on Microsoft Office 2010 and SharePoint technologies. Now retired but active in blogging and other interests.
Key services
Blog posts, Technical documents, Contact and social media engagement
Content quality
good
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
WordPress.com hosting, Jetpack plugin, Gutenberg editor, Google Fonts (PT Sans, PT Serif), Twitter widgets
Frameworks
WordPress
Platforms
WordPress.com
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No exposed sensitive data
  • Use of reputable hosting with managed security

Analytics and tracking

Services
WordPress.com Stats
Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Tracking pixels
WordPress.com stats pixel
Marketing tools
Jetpack Likes, Jetpack Sharing
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a personal blog of Rolf Granlund with technical and personal content.
  2. Hosted on WordPress.com with Jetpack and Gutenberg.
  3. No explicit privacy or cookie policies found.
  4. Contact information includes a personal Gmail address and Twitter handle.
  5. No business registration or corporate information present.
  6. Active comment section with community engagement.
  7. No signs of malicious or suspicious content.
  8. Good use of HTTPS and modern web technologies.
  9. No WAF or blocking detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses WordPress CMS hosted on WordPress.com, utilizing Jetpack and Gutenberg editor technologies. It loads Google Fonts and integrates Twitter widgets for social media. The site demonstrates moderate performance and good mobile optimization. SEO is supported by proper meta tags and Open Graph data. Accessibility is basic but could be improved. No custom or legacy vulnerable libraries were detected. The technical infrastructure is modern and well-maintained, suitable for a personal blog with moderate traffic.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with rigit.se. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review rigit.se.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.