Skip to main content

Security report for rigasmezi.lv

SIA "Rīgas meži" · Government · Latvia

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

68/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

SIA "Rīgas meži" is a Latvian government-related company focused on sustainable management of green infrastructure in Riga and the surrounding Pieriga region. Their services include forestry management, park and garden maintenance, environmental education, and organizing auctions and seedling sales. The website reflects a mature digital presence with modern technologies such as Alpine.js and Livewire, and integrates Google Tag Manager for analytics. The site is well-structured, mobile-optimized, and provides comprehensive privacy and cookie policies, indicating good compliance with GDPR standards. Security posture is solid with HTTPS enforced and cookie consent implemented, though some security headers and explicit incident response policies are absent. Overall, the domain's WHOIS data is unavailable due to query limits, limiting full trust assessment, but the website content and business information appear legitimate and consistent with a government entity.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching rigasmezi.lv

This scan found 19 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
50
Email security
85
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
10
Average
68

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company holds a strong market position as a key forestry and green infrastructure manager in Latvia's capital region. Their business model revolves around public service and environmental stewardship, targeting local residents, partners, and government stakeholders. The website's integration with partner domains such as government procurement portals and auction subdomains indicates a well-established partnership ecosystem. The presence of certifications and detailed contact information enhances credibility. The company leverages digital tools for outreach and engagement, including social media channels and multilingual support, positioning itself as a transparent and accessible organization.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a good security maturity level with HTTPS and cookie consent mechanisms in place. No critical vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. However, the absence of explicit security headers like Content Security Policy (CSP), HSTS, and X-Frame-Options suggests room for improvement. There is no visible security policy or incident response contact information, which could be a compliance gap. The use of third-party scripts such as Google Tag Manager and Tilde's Website Translator requires ongoing monitoring to mitigate supply chain risks. Overall, the security posture is adequate for a public-facing government-related site but could benefit from enhanced header policies and documented incident response procedures.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive security headers including CSP, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options to strengthen browser security.
  2. Publish a clear security policy and incident response contact information to improve transparency and compliance.
  3. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts to minimize supply chain vulnerabilities.
  4. Enhance WHOIS data availability or transparency to improve domain trustworthiness assessment.
  5. Maintain and update privacy and cookie policies to align with evolving GDPR and ePrivacy regulations.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
SIA "Rīgas meži"
VAT number
LV40003982628
Registration number
40003982628
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
SIA "Rīgas meži"
Description
Mēs rūpējamies par Rīgas un Pierīgas zaļo infrastruktūru, ilgtspējīgi apsaimniekojot dabas teritorijas, nodrošinot bioloģiskās daudzveidības saglabāšanu, ekonomiskās un sociālās vērtības pieaugumu, kā arī oglekļa piesaisti un uzkrāšanu.
Key services
Mežniecības un mežu apsaimniekošana, Dārzi un parki, Vides izglītība, Izsoles un koku stādu iegāde, Pasākumu saskaņošana un transporta iebraukšana, Ilgtspējas pārskati un fonds
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Alpine.js 3.14.9, Livewire, Tailwind CSS (inferred from class names), Swiper.js (carousel), Google Tag Manager (gtag.js), Website Translator by Tilde
Frameworks
Livewire
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent mechanism implemented
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics (via Google Tag Manager)
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Marketing tools
Website Translator by Tilde
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and navigation.
  2. Strong focus on environmental stewardship and public service.
  3. Comprehensive cookie consent and privacy policy present.
  4. No visible security policy or incident response information.
  5. WHOIS data unavailable, limiting domain trust assessment.
  6. Use of modern JavaScript frameworks and libraries.
  7. Social media presence on Facebook, YouTube, LinkedIn.
  8. Multiple language support (Latvian and English).
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern tech stack with Alpine.js for reactive UI components and Livewire for server-driven interactivity, indicating a contemporary approach to web development. Tailwind CSS is inferred from class naming conventions, providing a utility-first styling framework. The site includes a responsive design with mobile optimization and accessibility considerations. Performance is moderate, with preloading of CSS and JavaScript assets and use of CDN-hosted libraries like cdnjs and fonts.bunny.net. SEO is supported by proper meta tags and Open Graph data. The integration of Google Tag Manager facilitates analytics tracking, while Tilde's Website Translator enables multilingual support. Hosting provider details are not explicitly found. Overall, the technical implementation is robust with opportunities for performance tuning and enhanced security configurations.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with rigasmezi.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review rigasmezi.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.