Skip to main content

Security report for rigasjurists.lv

SIA RĪGAS JURISTS · Other · Latvia

Medium risk. 9 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Email security and 2 other checks.

Security score

58/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

SIA RĪGAS JURISTS is a Latvian legal and translation services provider specializing in professional legal consultations, document preparation, and certified translations with notary attestations. The company targets clients locally in Riga and across Latvia, as well as international clients requiring legal and translation support. The website presents a professional image with clear service offerings and contact information, positioning the company as a trusted small business in its sector. Technically, the website is built on the Tilda CMS platform, utilizing standard web technologies including jQuery and Google Analytics. The site is mobile-optimized and provides a good user experience, although some improvements in accessibility and SEO could be made. Security posture is moderate; HTTPS is implied but no security headers were detected, and no privacy or cookie policies are present, indicating room for compliance improvements. Overall, the site is safe, professional, and functional, but lacks some advanced security and privacy features.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

9 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching rigasjurists.lv

This scan found 26 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
30
Email security
60
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
10
Average
58

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company operates in the legal and translation services sector, offering notarized translations, document apostille and legalization, and legal consultations. Its business model focuses on service delivery to individuals and businesses requiring legal and translation assistance. The website content and social media presence suggest a well-established local presence with international cooperation capabilities. The company emphasizes quality and Latvian cultural values, aiming to maintain trust and professionalism. Revenue streams likely derive from service fees for legal and translation work. The absence of detailed WHOIS data limits domain legitimacy assessment, but the business information and contact details support credibility. No partnerships or subsidiaries were identified from the website content.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a basic to moderate security posture. HTTPS usage is indicated by the canonical URL, but no explicit security headers (such as Content-Security-Policy, HSTS, or X-Frame-Options) were detected in the provided data. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were found in the HTML content. The site lacks privacy and cookie policies, which is a compliance gap under GDPR. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is provided. The use of Google Analytics and Google Ads introduces tracking but is standard practice. Recommendations include implementing security headers, adding privacy and cookie policies, and ensuring secure form handling to enhance security and compliance.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to comply with GDPR and inform users.
  2. Add security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, Strict-Transport-Security, X-Frame-Options, and X-XSS-Protection.
  3. Ensure all forms include anti-CSRF tokens and input validation to prevent injection attacks.
  4. Regularly update third-party libraries and scripts to mitigate vulnerabilities.
  5. Consider publishing a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to improve transparency and incident response readiness.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
SIA RĪGAS JURISTS
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
SIA RĪGAS JURISTS
Description
SIA RĪGAS JURISTS is a legal and translation services provider offering professional legal consultations, document preparation, and specialized translation services with notarized certifications. The company targets clients in Riga and throughout Latvia, providing comprehensive legal support and international cooperation facilitation.
Key services
Legal services, Document preparation, Certified translations with notary certification, Document apostille and legalization
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
JavaScript, jQuery 1.10.2, Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics (gtag.js), Tilda Publishing platform scripts and CSS
Platforms
Tilda CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
60/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS usage implied by canonical URL (https://rigasjurists.lv)
  • No exposed sensitive data found in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Ad networks
Google Ads (AW-16741595570)
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. WHOIS data unavailable due to query limit error; no registrar or domain age info extracted.
  3. No explicit privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found on the site.
  4. Contact information is clearly presented with phone, email, and physical address.
  5. Website uses Tilda CMS platform with standard scripts and Google Analytics integration.
  6. No security headers detected in provided data; HTTPS usage implied but not confirmed by headers.
  7. No vulnerability disclosures or security incident response info found.
  8. Content is professional, relevant, and safe for general audiences.
  9. Advertising and tracking via Google Ads and Analytics present but basic.
  10. Overall website quality and professionalism are good for a small legal services provider.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on the Tilda CMS platform, using JavaScript, jQuery 1.10.2, and Google Analytics for tracking. The site loads multiple CSS and JS assets from Tilda's CDN and Google Fonts. Performance is moderate with mobile optimization rated good. Accessibility features are basic, with no explicit ARIA roles or advanced accessibility markup detected. SEO is supported by meta tags and Open Graph tags, but no JSON-LD structured data was found. The site uses canonical URLs and preconnect/dns-prefetch hints for performance. Hosting provider details are not explicitly available. The site could benefit from modernizing the JavaScript libraries and enhancing accessibility and SEO features.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with rigasjurists.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review rigasjurists.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.