Skip to main content

Security report for rigarocket.eu

Riga Rocket · Other · N/a

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Email security and 2 other checks.

Security score

63/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Riga Rocket is a staffing agency specializing in comprehensive global employment services including recruitment, candidate screening, document processing, relocation logistics, and onboarding management. The company positions itself as a fast and guaranteed solution for hiring top talent, targeting businesses seeking efficient staffing solutions. The website demonstrates a professional design with consistent branding and clear service offerings, supported by partner logos from reputable platforms such as LinkedIn and Glassdoor. Technically, the site is built using modern frameworks like Next.js and React, with asynchronous loading of scripts and font optimization, indicating a mature digital infrastructure. Security posture is moderate with HTTPS implied but lacks explicit security headers and privacy compliance documentation. No privacy or cookie policies were found, and contact information is not explicitly provided, which may impact user trust and regulatory compliance. Overall, the website is safe, professional, and functional but would benefit from enhanced privacy and security disclosures to improve compliance and user confidence.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
28/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  2. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching rigarocket.eu

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
35
Email security
60
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
28
Average
63

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The business operates in the staffing and recruitment sector, offering a pay-after-hire model and guarantees such as replacement or refund, which are strong competitive advantages. The use of behavioral data and smart profiling for candidate selection indicates a data-driven approach. The target customers are companies worldwide looking for staffing solutions with quick turnaround times. The presence of partner logos suggests a well-established partnership ecosystem. The business model focuses on service quality and risk reduction for clients. However, the lack of detailed company registration or contact information on the website limits transparency. The company appears to be small-sized with a niche focus on staffing services, without evidence of subsidiaries or parent companies.

Security posture

The website uses HTTPS, which is mandatory for secure communications. However, no security headers such as Content Security Policy, HSTS, or X-Frame-Options were detected in the provided content, which are recommended best practices. There is no exposed sensitive data or visible vulnerabilities in the HTML. The use of third-party scripts like Clerk.js for authentication is noted, but no known vulnerable libraries were identified. The absence of explicit security policies, incident response contacts, or vulnerability disclosure mechanisms indicates a gap in security transparency and readiness. Privacy compliance is weak due to missing privacy and cookie policies, which could pose regulatory risks under GDPR or similar frameworks. Overall, the security posture is moderate but requires improvements in policy disclosures and technical security headers.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie policy with clear consent mechanisms to ensure GDPR compliance.
  2. Add security headers such as Content Security Policy, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  3. Provide explicit contact information including company emails and phone numbers to improve trust and facilitate communication.
  4. Establish and disclose an incident response plan and security contact channels to demonstrate security maturity.
  5. Regularly audit and update third-party libraries and scripts to mitigate potential vulnerabilities.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Riga Rocket
Description
Riga Rocket provides comprehensive staff employment services worldwide, focusing on recruitment, screening, document processing, relocation, and management of hires.
Key services
Recruitment, Candidate Screening, Document Processing, Relocation Logistics and Accommodation, Onboarding and Oversight
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
React, Next.js, Clerk.js, Fontshare Fonts
Frameworks
Next.js
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • Use of HTTPS (implied by URL)
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Marketing tools
Clerk.js
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenge
  2. No explicit privacy, cookie, or terms of service pages found in the HTML content
  3. No contact emails or phone numbers explicitly found in the visible content
  4. Use of modern web technologies and frameworks
  5. Strong branding and consistent design
  6. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure information found
  7. No explicit security policies or incident response contacts provided
  8. No certifications or compliance badges displayed
  9. Partner logos from reputable platforms included
  10. No suspicious or malicious content detected
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern React and Next.js stack, leveraging asynchronous script loading and font optimization for performance. The use of Clerk.js indicates integration of modern authentication services. The site is mobile optimized with responsive design elements. However, accessibility features appear basic and could be enhanced. SEO is supported by proper meta tags and structured content, but no JSON-LD or Open Graph metadata was detected in the provided snippet. Hosting provider details are not evident from the content. Performance is moderate, with potential for improvement through enhanced caching and security header implementation. Overall, the technical infrastructure is solid but could benefit from additional accessibility and security enhancements.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with rigarocket.eu. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review rigarocket.eu.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.