Skip to main content

Security report for riesa.io

Riesa Consultative Oy · Other · Finland

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

58/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Riesa Consultative Oy is a Finnish consulting company specializing in accessibility and equality services. The company positions itself as Finland's leading accessibility expert, offering services such as the Accessibility Index and urban environment accessibility consulting. Their target audience includes organizations seeking to improve accessibility and inclusivity. The website is professionally designed, well-structured, and provides clear information about services and client references, supporting a strong market position in the accessibility consulting niche. Technically, the website is built on WordPress with modern SEO and analytics tools including Yoast SEO, Google Analytics, and Google Tag Manager. The site is mobile-optimized and demonstrates good accessibility practices. Hosting and DNS are managed with Cloudflare, ensuring reliable performance and security. The site uses HTTPS with a valid SSL certificate, though DNSSEC is not enabled. From a security perspective, the site enforces HTTPS and employs cookie consent mechanisms compliant with GDPR. However, it lacks visible security policies, incident response contacts, and advanced security headers. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected. The domain registration is consistent with the business profile, using privacy protection services reasonably. Overall, the website presents a low-risk profile with strong business credibility and good privacy compliance. Strategic improvements include enabling DNSSEC, publishing security policies, and enhancing security headers to further strengthen the security posture.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
50/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Google Analytics, Facebook, LinkedIn

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching riesa.io

This scan found 22 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
45
Email security
70
DNS health
70
Network security
40
GDPR outside view
50
Average
58

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention riesa.io, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for riesa.io right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Riesa Consultative Oy operates in the niche market of accessibility consulting in Finland, targeting public and private sector clients interested in improving accessibility and equality. Their business model revolves around consulting services and proprietary tools like the Accessibility Index. The company leverages partnerships with other organizations to enhance service offerings. The website showcases client references and media presence, indicating active market engagement and credibility. Growth potential exists in expanding accessibility awareness and regulatory compliance needs. The company maintains a small size with focused expertise, positioning itself as a trusted leader in its sector.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate to good security maturity level with HTTPS enforced and cookie consent implemented. The absence of DNSSEC and advanced security headers suggests room for improvement. No incident response or security policy information is publicly available, which could hinder transparency and preparedness. The use of privacy protection for WHOIS is justified for a small consulting firm. No critical vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were found. Overall, the security posture is adequate for the business type but could benefit from enhanced policies and technical controls to align with best practices and compliance frameworks.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC to improve domain security and prevent DNS spoofing.
  2. Implement security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security.
  3. Publish a clear security policy and incident response contact information on the website.
  4. Consider establishing a vulnerability disclosure program or security.txt file.
  5. Regularly review and update privacy and cookie policies to maintain GDPR compliance and transparency.

Contact details published on the site

Legal name
Riesa Consultative Oy
Registration number
2961621-2
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Riesa Consultative Oy
Description
Riesa Consultative Oy on palkittu esteettömyyden ja yhdenvertaisuuden edistämiseen keskittyvä konsulttiyritys.
Key services
Esteettömyysindeksi (Accessibility Index), Kaupunkiympäristön esteettömyys (Urban Environment Accessibility), Other tailored accessibility consulting services
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Yoast SEO, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Cloudflare DNS
Frameworks
WordPress
Platforms
WordPress CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • ClientTransferProhibited domain status
  • Cookie consent mechanism implemented

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is professionally designed and well-structured.
  2. Content is focused on accessibility consulting services in Finland.
  3. Strong emphasis on accessibility and equality.
  4. Cookie consent and privacy policy are implemented and GDPR compliant.
  5. No visible security policy or incident response information.
  6. No terms of service found.
  7. Social media presence on Instagram, Facebook, and LinkedIn.
  8. No suspicious or malicious content detected.
  9. Use of modern web technologies and SEO best practices.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern WordPress platform with Yoast SEO for search optimization and Google Analytics for visitor tracking. It uses Google Tag Manager for flexible tag management. The site loads scripts asynchronously and employs cookie consent scripts to comply with privacy regulations. Hosting details are not explicit, but DNS is managed via Cloudflare, indicating reliable infrastructure. Performance is moderate with good mobile optimization and accessibility features. The site uses structured data (JSON-LD) for SEO enhancement. There is no indication of outdated or vulnerable libraries. Overall, the technical implementation supports a professional and user-friendly web presence with opportunities for security enhancements.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with riesa.io. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review riesa.io.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.