Skip to main content

Security report for ricoh.at

Ricoh · Technology · Austria

High risk. 8 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, SSL/TLS and 1 other check.

Security score

44/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website ricoh.at represents a corporate entity associated with Ricoh, a recognized technology company specializing in imaging and printing solutions. However, the website content is currently inaccessible, returning a 403 Forbidden error page, which blocks access to any meaningful content or user interaction. The visible page contains minimal information, including a corporate logo and a contact email address for communication. From a technical perspective, the site lacks a valid SSL/TLS certificate and does not support HTTPS, despite having a strict-transport-security header present. No modern web technologies, analytics, or advertising tools are detected, and the site performance metrics are unavailable due to the blocked content. DNS records are properly configured with valid MX and NS entries and multiple TXT records for domain verification and SPF, indicating legitimate domain management. Security posture is weak due to the absence of HTTPS and the invalid SSL configuration, which is a critical issue. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies are found, indicating poor privacy compliance. The domain registration data is consistent with a legitimate corporate entity, but the lack of accessible content and security controls significantly reduces trustworthiness and usability. Overall, the site is currently non-functional for end users and presents critical security and compliance gaps. Immediate remediation is required to install a valid SSL certificate, enable HTTPS, and provide accessible content with appropriate privacy and security policies to improve trust and compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
0/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • Critical

      No HTTPS encryption

      GDPR requires appropriate security measures for personal data

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate for HTTPS

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Critical

      No HTTPS Encryption

      Website does not use HTTPS encryption, making all data transmission vulnerable to interception

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate and redirect all HTTP traffic to HTTPS

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching ricoh.at

This scan found 18 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
0
Security headers
30
Email security
50
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
0
Average
44

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Ricoh is a well-known global technology company primarily operating in the imaging and printing sector. The domain ricoh.at is likely intended to serve the Austrian market segment of Ricoh's business. The business model focuses on providing office technology solutions to corporate and individual customers. The presence of multiple domain verification TXT records suggests active domain management and integration with corporate services such as Microsoft Outlook mail protection and marketing platforms like Eloqua. The website's current inaccessibility limits direct insights into revenue streams or customer engagement strategies. However, the corporate email contact indicates a channel for business communication. The lack of visible marketing or analytics tools suggests either a minimal web presence or a temporary site outage. The domain's DNS and MX configurations align with enterprise-grade email and domain management, supporting the legitimacy of the business operations behind the domain.

Security posture

The security posture of ricoh.at is currently poor. The absence of a valid SSL certificate and HTTPS support exposes the site to risks such as data interception and man-in-the-middle attacks. Although a strict-transport-security header is present, it is ineffective without HTTPS. No other security headers or mechanisms are detected. DNSSEC and CAA records are not enabled, which could improve DNS security. No known vulnerabilities such as Heartbleed, POODLE, or FREAK are detected, but this is likely due to the lack of SSL/TLS implementation rather than active mitigation. The site does not provide any security or incident response policies, nor does it disclose vulnerability handling procedures. The presence of corporate email contact is a positive indicator but insufficient for comprehensive incident response readiness. Overall, the site requires urgent security improvements, including SSL installation, HTTPS enforcement, and implementation of security best practices to protect users and corporate data.

Recommendations

  1. Install and configure a valid SSL/TLS certificate to enable HTTPS across the entire site.
  2. Enable and properly configure HSTS with includeSubDomains and preload directives.
  3. Publish clear privacy, cookie, and terms of service policies to improve compliance and user trust.
  4. Implement additional security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  5. Establish and publicize an incident response contact channel and vulnerability disclosure policy.
Technical notes

Notes

The website currently serves a minimal HTML page with a 403 Forbidden status, indicating restricted access. No CMS, frameworks, or JavaScript libraries are detected. The HTTP headers include a strict-transport-security header, but no SSL/TLS protocols or cipher suites are active, indicating no HTTPS support. DNS records are well configured with valid A, MX, NS, and TXT records, including SPF and domain verification entries. Performance metrics are unavailable due to the blocked content. The site lacks metadata, Open Graph tags, JSON-LD structured data, forms, or interactive elements. No analytics or advertising scripts are present. The overall technical implementation is minimal and requires modernization and security hardening to meet enterprise standards.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 56/100Medium6 findings · partial scanView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with ricoh.at. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review ricoh.at.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.