Skip to main content

Security report for ricmanice.cz

Obec Řícmanice · Government · Czech Republic

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view and Security headers.

Security score

68/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Obec Řícmanice operates an official municipal website serving the local community in the Jihomoravský region of the Czech Republic. The site provides residents and visitors with information about local events, municipal services, contact details, and public notices. The business model is that of a local government entity focused on community engagement and information dissemination. The website is positioned as a trusted source for municipal information with a long domain history dating back to 2003, reinforcing its legitimacy and community presence. Technically, the website uses a custom CMS platform provided by Obce na webu s.r.o., leveraging JavaScript libraries such as jQuery, Prototype.js, and Scriptaculous, along with JWPlayer for media content. Google Analytics is used for visitor tracking. The site demonstrates moderate performance and basic mobile optimization, with good accessibility and SEO practices. However, there is room for improvement in modernizing the tech stack and enhancing performance. From a security perspective, the site uses HTTPS and does not expose sensitive data. However, it lacks explicit security headers and published security policies or incident response procedures. Privacy compliance is limited, with no cookie consent mechanism or detailed privacy policy addressing GDPR requirements. The WHOIS data is consistent and supports the site's legitimacy. Overall, the website is a reliable and professional municipal portal with good business credibility but could improve its privacy compliance and security posture to better protect users and meet regulatory standards.

Scanned

This is an earlier scan of ricmanice.cz. View the latest report

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching ricmanice.cz

This scan found 19 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
85
Security headers
50
Email security
85
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
10
Average
68

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The website serves a small municipal government sector focused on local residents and visitors. Its competitive advantage lies in its official status and comprehensive local information offerings, including event calendars, public notices, and community services. Revenue streams are typical for government entities, likely funded by local taxes and government budgets. The target customer segment is the local population and stakeholders interested in municipal affairs. The partnership ecosystem includes local crisis portals and municipal service platforms, enhancing community engagement. Strategic observations suggest maintaining and improving digital services and compliance to strengthen community trust and operational resilience.

Security posture

The current security maturity is moderate. The site benefits from HTTPS encryption and absence of exposed sensitive data. However, the lack of security headers, absence of published security policies, and missing incident response contact points indicate gaps in security governance. Compliance with GDPR is partial, with no cookie consent or detailed privacy policy. The use of third-party analytics introduces moderate user tracking without clear privacy controls. There are no visible vulnerabilities or malicious indicators, but improvements in security best practices and transparency are recommended to reduce risk and enhance user trust.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish a comprehensive privacy and cookie policy with GDPR-compliant consent mechanisms.
  2. Add security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security to enhance protection.
  3. Publish a security policy and incident response contact information to improve transparency and readiness.
  4. Regularly update and audit JavaScript libraries and dependencies to mitigate potential vulnerabilities.
  5. Enhance mobile optimization and site performance to improve user experience and accessibility.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Obce na webu s.r.o.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Obec Řícmanice
Description
Oficiální webové stránky obce Řícmanice, obce v Jihomoravském kraji, okres Brno-venkov, přibližně 10,5 km od Brna.
Key services
Information about the municipality, Event calendar, Local services and organizations, Contact information, Public notices and documents
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
JavaScript, jQuery, Prototype.js, Scriptaculous, JWPlayer, Google Analytics
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • Use of HTTPS (implied by URLs)
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • No visible vulnerable libraries

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is an official municipal site for Řícmanice, Czech Republic.
  2. Content is comprehensive for local residents including events, services, and contact info.
  3. No privacy or cookie policy explicitly found, which is a compliance gap.
  4. Uses standard web technologies and includes Google Analytics for tracking.
  5. No security policy or incident response information published.
  6. No signs of suspicious or malicious content.
  7. WHOIS data is consistent and domain is long-established.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a custom CMS platform tailored for municipal websites, using a combination of legacy and modern JavaScript libraries. It integrates media playback via JWPlayer and tracking through Google Analytics and Tag Manager. The site demonstrates moderate loading performance and basic mobile responsiveness. Accessibility features such as skip links and ARIA roles are present, indicating attention to inclusive design. SEO is supported by meta tags and structured navigation. Technical risks include reliance on older JavaScript libraries and lack of advanced security headers. Modernization opportunities include upgrading the tech stack, improving performance, and implementing stronger security controls.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 65/100Medium30 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with ricmanice.cz. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review ricmanice.cz.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.