Skip to main content

Security report for rhinodoorsfactory.com

SIA "Rhino Doors" · Manufacturing · Latvia

High risk. 6 critical or high findings in SSL/TLS, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

45/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Rhino Doors is a Latvia-based manufacturer specializing in internal fire-rated timber doorsets and screens, serving residential, commercial, hospitality, government, and medical sectors primarily in the UK and worldwide. The company emphasizes certified quality with ISO 9001 and BM Trada Q Mark Scheme accreditations, positioning itself as a trusted provider of fire-resistant doors and related architectural hardware. Their product range also includes custom windows and furniture, highlighting a diversified manufacturing capability. The website reflects a professional digital presence built on WordPress with Elementor, featuring good design, navigation, and mobile optimization. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS and reCAPTCHA but lacks advanced security headers and explicit privacy compliance documentation. Contact information is clearly presented, enhancing business credibility. Overall, the site is functional and trustworthy but would benefit from improved privacy and security policy disclosures.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
58/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Critical

      Unable to retrieve SSL certificate

      Could not establish secure connection to retrieve certificate information

      What to do: Check if the server is accessible and SSL/TLS is properly configured

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

  3. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching rhinodoorsfactory.com

This scan found 18 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
0
Security headers
30
Email security
85
DNS health
75
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
58
Average
45

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company operates in the manufacturing sector with a focus on fire-rated doors and security solutions, targeting a niche market that requires certified safety products. Their business model is direct manufacturing and sales with international reach, supported by certifications that enhance market trust. The presence of multiple contact points and certifications suggests a growth-oriented and customer-focused approach. The domain age aligns with the company's founding year, indicating a new but legitimate business. The lack of privacy and cookie policies may pose compliance risks, especially for EU customers under GDPR. The company could strengthen its market position by enhancing transparency and security practices.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS and Google reCAPTCHA v3, which are positive security measures. However, the absence of HTTP security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options reduces the overall security posture. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is provided, limiting transparency in security management. DNSSEC is not enabled, which is a minor gap in domain security. The site does not expose sensitive data or show signs of vulnerable libraries but would benefit from regular security audits and policy disclosures to improve trust and compliance.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to ensure GDPR compliance.
  2. Add HTTP security headers to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  3. Enable DNSSEC for the domain to improve DNS security.
  4. Provide clear incident response and vulnerability disclosure information to build trust.
  5. Regularly audit and update all plugins and themes to mitigate vulnerabilities.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
SIA "Rhino Doors"
Registration number
40103171549
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
SIA "Rhino Doors"
Description
Internal fire-rated timber doorsets and screens for residential homes, hospitality, leisure, offices, public facilities, government agencies, medical facilities, etc. Production facility headquartered in Latvia providing services worldwide. Doorset solutions approved under BM Trada’s Q Mark Scheme for Fire and Security (PAS24). Also produces custom windows and furniture.
Key services
Fire-rated doors, External doors, Windows, Architectural hardware/ironmongery, Custom windows and furniture
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Elementor, Yoast SEO, Google reCAPTCHA v3, Google Fonts, Google Tag Manager
Frameworks
Elementor
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
65/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Google reCAPTCHA v3 implemented on forms

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Marketing tools
Yoast SEO
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is professionally designed with clear navigation and good content quality.
  2. No privacy or cookie policy pages found which is a compliance gap.
  3. Contact information is clearly presented with multiple phone numbers and emails.
  4. Security headers are missing; site uses HTTPS and reCAPTCHA.
  5. WHOIS data shows recent domain registration consistent with business age.
  6. No WAF or blocking detected; site fully accessible.
  7. Certifications and trust signals are prominently displayed.
  8. No vulnerability disclosure or incident response information found.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress using Elementor and Yoast SEO, indicating a modern and flexible CMS platform. It uses Google Fonts and Google Tag Manager for analytics and marketing. Performance is moderate with good mobile optimization. The site uses Google reCAPTCHA v3 for bot protection. However, the lack of security headers and DNSSEC indicates some technical debt in security hardening. SEO is well addressed with meta tags and structured data (JSON-LD). Accessibility is basic but could be improved. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports the business needs but requires enhancements in security and privacy compliance.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with rhinodoorsfactory.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review rhinodoorsfactory.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.