Skip to main content

Security report for rgk.lv

Rēzeknes Gaļas Kombināts, SIA · Manufacturing · Latvia

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view and Security headers.

Security score

64/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Rēzeknes Gaļas Kombināts, SIA is a medium-sized Latvian meat processing company specializing in full-cycle meat production from slaughtering to product delivery. The company offers a wide range of traditional and modern meat products targeting the general Latvian population, including retail stores and institutional clients such as schools and kindergartens. The website reflects a professional business with consistent branding and a clear focus on product presentation and customer engagement. Technically, the site uses a modern JavaScript stack with jQuery and integrates hCaptcha for form protection and Google Analytics for user tracking. Privacy and cookie policies are prominently presented, indicating good GDPR compliance. Security posture is solid with HTTPS and spam protection, though additional security headers could enhance protection. Overall, the site is well-structured, user-friendly, and trustworthy, supporting the company's market position as a leading local meat producer.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
28/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching rgk.lv

This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
95
Security headers
15
Email security
70
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
28
Average
64

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company holds a strong market position as one of the largest local meat processors in Latvia, leveraging traditional recipes combined with modern production techniques. Their business model focuses on manufacturing and distributing a broad product range, including sausages, smoked meats, and frozen semi-finished products. The presence of HACCP certification and detailed privacy and cookie policies indicates regulatory compliance and operational maturity. The website's multilingual support and active social media presence suggest a strategy to engage diverse customer segments and enhance brand visibility. Partnerships with local service providers like zing.lv for website development demonstrate a collaborative ecosystem. Growth potential is supported by product diversification and institutional sales channels.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a mature security posture with enforced HTTPS, use of hCaptcha to mitigate spam on contact forms, and a comprehensive cookie consent mechanism aligned with GDPR requirements. However, the absence of explicit security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options represents an area for improvement. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. The lack of a published security policy or incident response contact limits transparency in security incident handling. Overall, the site balances usability and security well but could benefit from enhanced header configurations and formalized security documentation.

Recommendations

  1. Implement security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to strengthen browser security.
  2. Publish a dedicated security policy and provide incident response contact information to improve transparency and trust.
  3. Regularly review and update third-party scripts and libraries to mitigate potential vulnerabilities.
  4. Enhance accessibility features to improve compliance and user experience for all visitors.
  5. Consider adding data retention policies and clearer disclosures regarding analytics data handling.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Rēzeknes Gaļas Kombināts, SIA
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Rēzeknes Gaļas Kombināts, SIA
Description
Rēzeknes gaļas kombināts ir pilna cikla gaļas pārstrādes uzņēmums, nodrošinot procesu no lopu kaušanas līdz gatavās produkcijas piegādei veikaliem. Ražo gaļas produktus pēc sentēvu tradīcijām un receptēm, piedāvājot plašu sortimentu ikvienam Latvijas iedzīvotājam.
Key services
Gaļas pārstrāde, Gaļas produktu ražošana, Piegāde veikaliem, Produkti skolām un bērnudārziem
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
JavaScript, jQuery, hCaptcha, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • hCaptcha on contact form
  • Cookie consent with opt-in mechanism

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and navigation.
  2. Strong focus on privacy and cookie consent compliance.
  3. Use of hCaptcha for spam protection on contact form.
  4. Multiple language options available (LV, RU, EN).
  5. Social media presence on Facebook, Instagram, TikTok.
  6. No visible security headers detected in HTML content.
  7. WHOIS data unavailable due to query limit; limits domain trust verification.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a Mono CMS platform utilizing JavaScript and jQuery libraries, with integration of hCaptcha for bot protection and Google Analytics for traffic analysis. The site loads multiple deferred scripts from a CDN, optimizing performance. Mobile optimization is good with responsive design elements and adaptive images. SEO is supported by proper meta tags and Open Graph data. However, no advanced frameworks or platforms like React or Angular are detected, indicating a traditional web architecture. Performance is moderate, with potential improvements in accessibility and security headers. Hosting provider details are not explicitly found in the HTML content.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with rgk.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review rgk.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.