Skip to main content

Security report for rfts.lv

Ready For the Show · Other · Latvia

High risk. 12 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Email security and 3 other checks.

Security score

39/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Ready For the Show is a Latvian-based small business specializing in comprehensive event technical services including stage construction, lighting design, audio provision, 3D stage and event design, video IMAG projection, live streaming, and technical personnel support. The company targets event organizers requiring professional technical support for concerts, seminars, weddings, and corporate events. The website presents a professional and consistent brand image with clear service offerings and contact information, positioning itself as a reliable local provider in the event services market. Technically, the website employs a modern frontend stack with popular JavaScript libraries and CSS frameworks such as jQuery, Bootstrap, fullPage.js, and Slick Carousel, ensuring a good user experience and mobile optimization. However, there is no evidence of a CMS or backend platform, and no analytics or tracking scripts were detected, indicating a focus on privacy but also limited digital marketing sophistication. From a security perspective, the site lacks visible security headers and privacy or cookie policies, which are important for compliance with GDPR and other regulations. The absence of WHOIS data due to query limits restricts domain legitimacy verification, though the site content and contact details appear genuine. No critical vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were found in the HTML content. Overall, the website is functional and professional but would benefit from enhanced security practices, privacy compliance measures, and domain registration transparency to improve trustworthiness and regulatory adherence.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

12 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

  2. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching rfts.lv

This scan found 29 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
15
Email security
40
DNS health
75
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
10
Average
39

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention rfts.lv, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for rfts.lv right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company operates in the event services sector, focusing on technical support for various event types including concerts, seminars, and private celebrations. Its competitive advantage lies in offering a full range of technical services from audio and lighting to video production and live streaming, supported by experienced technical personnel. The business model is service-oriented, targeting event organizers and clients in Latvia. The website indicates a small-sized operation with no parent or subsidiary companies mentioned. The lack of certifications or trust badges suggests a local or emerging market position. The company maintains a social media presence on Facebook, which may support marketing and client engagement. Growth indicators are not explicit, but the comprehensive service offering and professional presentation suggest a stable local presence.

Security posture

The current security posture is moderate but with notable gaps. The website uses HTTPS (assumed but not explicitly confirmed in HTML), but no security headers such as Content-Security-Policy or Strict-Transport-Security were detected, which are critical for mitigating common web attacks. No privacy or cookie policies are present, indicating potential GDPR non-compliance risks. The absence of incident response contacts or security policies reduces preparedness for security events. No vulnerable libraries or exposed sensitive data were found, which is positive. Overall, the site would benefit from implementing security best practices, including security headers, privacy compliance documentation, and incident response readiness to enhance its security maturity.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to ensure GDPR compliance and inform users about data handling.
  2. Add security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, X-Content-Type-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security to strengthen web security.
  3. Ensure HTTPS is properly configured and enforced site-wide with strong SSL/TLS settings.
  4. Publish incident response and security contact information to improve transparency and readiness.
  5. Obtain and display relevant certifications or trust badges to enhance business credibility and customer trust.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Ready For the Show
Description
Ready For the Show piedāvā visa veida pasākumu tehnisko nodrošinājumu un apkalpošanu. Kompānijai ir pieredze dažāda lieluma pasākumos, nodrošinot apskaņošanu, gaismošanu, skatuves konstrukcijas, video IMAG projecēšanā un tiešraižu producešanā. Piedāvā pilnu servisu jūsu pasākumam.
Key services
Skatuves konstrukcijas, Gaismu dizains, Audio nodrošinājums, Skatuves un pasākuma dizaina izstrāde 3D, Video IMAG projecēšana, Tiešraides nodrošināšana, Tehniskais personāls, Fotogrāfa pakalpojumi, Video izstrāde
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery, Bootstrap, fullPage.js, Slick Carousel, Magnific Popup, Animate.css, Font Awesome, Themify Icons, Vegas, Granim.js
Frameworks
Bootstrap
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
50/100
Good practices seen
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • No visible vulnerable libraries

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content about event technical services.
  2. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found on the site.
  3. Contact information is clearly provided with phone, email, and country.
  4. No security policy or incident response information is present.
  5. No certifications or compliance badges displayed.
  6. Modern frontend libraries and frameworks are used.
  7. No analytics or tracking scripts detected.
  8. No signs of adult or questionable content.
  9. WHOIS data unavailable, limiting domain legitimacy verification.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using a modern frontend technology stack including jQuery, Bootstrap, fullPage.js, and Slick Carousel, providing a responsive and visually appealing user experience. The site loads multiple CSS and JS libraries from local assets and Google Fonts, indicating a mix of self-hosted and external resources. No CMS or backend platform was detected, suggesting a static or custom-built site. Performance appears moderate with no obvious blocking scripts or heavy resources. Accessibility features are basic, with some ARIA roles and semantic HTML present. SEO optimization is basic, with meta keywords and description tags but no Open Graph or structured data markup. The site lacks analytics or tracking scripts, which may limit marketing insights but improves privacy. Overall, the technical implementation is solid but could be enhanced with SEO improvements, accessibility enhancements, and security hardening.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with rfts.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review rfts.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.