Skip to main content

Security report for rfltd.net

RFL Fuar · Other · Turkey

High risk. 13 critical or high findings in Network security, Security headers and 4 other checks.

Security score

40/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

RFL Fuar is a Turkish event organization company specializing in fairs and exhibitions, serving the Turkish foreign trade and industry sectors since 2006. The website presents the company as a leader in providing quality fair services and market access. The business targets professional and corporate clients involved in trade and industry within Turkey. The domain age and WHOIS data support the legitimacy and stability of the business. Technically, the website uses a range of common front-end libraries and frameworks such as Bootstrap, jQuery, and Owl Carousel, hosted on Bluehost. The site shows basic mobile responsiveness and moderate performance but lacks advanced SEO and accessibility features. No CMS or advanced platform is detected, indicating a custom or static site. From a security perspective, the site lacks visible HTTPS confirmation and security headers, and DNSSEC is not enabled. No privacy or cookie policies are published, indicating compliance gaps with GDPR and other privacy regulations. Contact information is clearly provided, but no incident response or security policies are visible. The security posture is moderate but requires improvements to meet best practices. Overall, the website is functional and moderately professional but requires enhancements in security, privacy compliance, and technical modernization to improve trust and user experience. Strategic recommendations include enabling HTTPS, publishing privacy and cookie policies, adding security headers, and improving accessibility and SEO.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

13 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • Critical

      Critical Service Exposed: MySQL

      Port 3306 (MySQL) is publicly accessible - MySQL - Database server

      What to do: Immediately restrict access to MySQL using firewall or VPN

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection
    • Critical

      Critical Service Exposed: PostgreSQL

      Port 5432 (PostgreSQL) is publicly accessible - PostgreSQL - Database server

      What to do: Immediately restrict access to PostgreSQL using firewall or VPN

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching rfltd.net

This scan found 31 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
15
Email security
75
DNS health
55
Network security
0
GDPR outside view
35
Average
40

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet · found on this site
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

RFL Fuar operates in the event organization sector, focusing on fairs and exhibitions primarily in Turkey. The company leverages its long-standing presence since 2006 to position itself as a leader in the market. Its business model revolves around organizing trade fairs that facilitate market access for Turkish businesses. The company targets B2B clients in foreign trade and industry sectors. The website content and client logos suggest a moderate level of trust and established client relationships. The absence of social media and advanced marketing tools indicates a traditional or localized marketing approach. The company appears small in size with no visible subsidiaries or parent company affiliations.

Security posture

The current security posture of the website is basic with several notable gaps. The absence of HTTPS confirmation and security headers exposes the site to potential risks such as data interception and clickjacking. DNSSEC is not enabled, which could increase DNS spoofing risks. No privacy or cookie policies are published, indicating non-compliance with GDPR and related regulations. There is no visible incident response or vulnerability disclosure information, which limits transparency and readiness for security incidents. The domain registration is stable and trustworthy, but technical security controls on the website need significant improvement to protect user data and enhance trust.

Recommendations

  1. Enable HTTPS with a valid SSL/TLS certificate and enforce HTTPS site-wide.
  2. Publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to comply with GDPR and inform users.
  3. Implement cookie consent mechanisms to obtain user consent for tracking.
  4. Add security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-XSS-Protection.
  5. Enable DNSSEC for the domain to improve DNS security and integrity.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
RFL Fuar
Description
RFL Fuar is a Turkish company specializing in organizing fairs and exhibitions, serving Turkish foreign trade and industry since 2006. They provide market access through fairs and offer quality services in this domain.
Key services
Fair organization, Exhibition services, Incentive programs
Content quality
basic
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
jQuery, Bootstrap, Swiper, Owl Carousel, Flexslider, Font Awesome, Lightbox, WOW.js, FakeLoader, Isotope, ElevateZoom
Frameworks
Bootstrap
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
40/100
Good practices seen
  • Domain status clientTransferProhibited set

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
basic
User experience
basic
Content relevance
basic
Navigation
good
Professionalism
basic
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is in Turkish with an English version available.
  2. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found.
  3. Contact information is clearly provided in footer.
  4. No social media links detected.
  5. No analytics or tracking scripts detected.
  6. Website uses multiple common JavaScript libraries and CSS frameworks.
  7. No visible security headers or HTTPS confirmation in provided data.
  8. Domain WHOIS data is consistent and shows no privacy protection.
  9. Content is business-focused and safe for general audiences.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a traditional front-end technology stack with Bootstrap, jQuery, and various UI libraries for sliders and carousels. The hosting provider is Bluehost, a common shared hosting service suitable for small businesses. The site shows basic mobile responsiveness but lacks advanced SEO and accessibility features. No CMS or backend platform is detected, suggesting a static or custom-built site. Performance is moderate with no explicit optimization indicators. The site lacks modern security features such as HTTPS enforcement and security headers, which are critical for protecting user data and maintaining trust.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with rfltd.net. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review rfltd.net.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.