Skip to main content

Security report for rf-technologies.com

Rogue Fish Media · Other · N/a

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

66/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Rogue Fish Media operates as a digital real estate business specializing in the sale and leasing of premium domain names. The website presents a portfolio of high-value domains but lacks detailed business information, contact details, or compliance documentation. Technically, the site is built using Dynadot's website builder platform and includes common web technologies such as jQuery, FontAwesome, and Google Analytics. However, the use of an outdated jQuery version and absence of visible security headers or HTTPS status raise concerns about security maturity. The WHOIS data is notably absent, which undermines domain legitimacy and trust. Privacy and cookie policies are missing, indicating poor compliance with data protection regulations. Overall, the site provides basic content with moderate technical implementation but lacks critical security and compliance features.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching rf-technologies.com

This scan found 22 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
50
Email security
70
DNS health
70
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
35
Average
66

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The business targets domain investors and companies seeking premium domain names, positioning itself as a niche player in digital real estate. The business model revolves around domain sales and leasing, with a portfolio of notable domain names showcased. The lack of contact information and corporate details limits transparency and may hinder customer trust. The partnership with Dynadot for website building suggests reliance on third-party platforms. Marketing efforts include Google Analytics tracking but lack visible privacy compliance. Growth potential depends on establishing stronger trust signals and compliance adherence.

Security posture

The security posture is weak due to missing HTTPS verification, absence of security headers, and use of outdated JavaScript libraries. No incident response or security policy information is provided. The lack of privacy and cookie policies further exposes the business to regulatory risks. No forms or input fields reduce attack surface but also limit user engagement. The missing WHOIS data is a significant trust concern. Overall, the site requires urgent improvements in SSL configuration, security headers, and compliance documentation to enhance security maturity.

Recommendations

  1. Implement HTTPS with a valid SSL certificate and verify configuration.
  2. Add comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with consent mechanisms.
  3. Update JavaScript libraries to current secure versions to mitigate vulnerabilities.
  4. Publish contact information including emails and phone numbers for transparency.
  5. Add security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options to harden security.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Rogue Fish Media
Description
Rogue Fish Media appears to be a digital real estate business focused on the sale, lease, or creative ventures involving premium domain names. The site highlights a portfolio of high-value domain names available for acquisition.
Key services
Domain name sales, Domain leasing, Domain portfolio management
Content quality
basic
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
jQuery 1.12.1, YouTube Player API, Vimeo Player, FontAwesome 6 and 6.5, Day.js, LazySizes, Dynadot Website Builder
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
30/100

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
basic
User experience
basic
Content relevance
basic
Navigation
good
Professionalism
basic
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is accessible with no WAF or blocking detected.
  2. Content is minimal and focused on domain sales with no privacy or cookie policies present.
  3. No contact emails, phone numbers, or physical addresses found on the site.
  4. No forms detected for user input or contact.
  5. Use of older jQuery version (1.12.1) may pose security risks.
  6. Google Analytics is used for tracking without visible privacy compliance.
  7. No security headers or HTTPS status information available from provided data.
  8. WHOIS data is missing, indicating possible domain registration or privacy issues.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses Dynadot's website builder platform with a tech stack including jQuery 1.12.1, FontAwesome, Day.js, and Google Analytics. The site loads multiple CSS and JS resources asynchronously, indicating moderate performance optimization. Mobile responsiveness appears good based on CSS references. However, the use of an outdated jQuery version is a technical debt and potential security risk. No CMS beyond Dynadot builder is detected. Hosting provider details are not available. SEO and accessibility features are basic, with minimal metadata and no structured data found. Overall, the technical implementation is functional but dated and lacking advanced optimization or security hardening.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with rf-technologies.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review rf-technologies.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.