Skip to main content

Security report for revisioncooperative.coop

ARESCOP · Other · France

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in Email security, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

58/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website revisioncooperative.coop represents ARESCOP, a cooperative network focused on providing cooperative revision and auditing services to Scop, Scic, and Coop47 entities in France. The platform serves as an informational and contact portal, offering regional office details and testimonials to support cooperative governance. The business model is non-profit and cooperative-oriented, targeting cooperative enterprises and their members across France. Technically, the website is built on Drupal 10, leveraging modern web technologies including FontAwesome for icons and Matomo for analytics, complemented by a GDPR-compliant cookie consent mechanism (tarteaucitron). The site demonstrates good mobile optimization, accessibility, and SEO practices, although performance is moderate. Hosting details are not explicit. From a security perspective, the site enforces HTTPS and uses cookie consent tools but lacks advanced security headers and a published security policy or incident response contacts. The domain registration is consistent with the business, registered under ARESCOP in France since 2019, indicating legitimacy. No WAF or blocking mechanisms are detected. Overall, the site is professional, trustworthy, and compliant with privacy regulations, with room for improvement in security hardening and transparency regarding incident response and vulnerability disclosure.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
50/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1

  3. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Google Analytics

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching revisioncooperative.coop

This scan found 21 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
57
Security headers
65
Email security
60
DNS health
75
Network security
40
GDPR outside view
50
Average
58

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

ARESCOP operates as a cooperative network providing revision services to cooperative enterprises in France, positioning itself as a key player in cooperative governance support. The network has a national presence with multiple regional offices, enhancing accessibility and localized support. The business model is service-oriented, focusing on auditing and cooperative health rather than commercial profit. Testimonials and network affiliations strengthen credibility. The site links extensively to partner cooperative organizations, indicating a strong ecosystem. Growth potential lies in expanding cooperative support and digital services. The cooperative sector focus and non-profit nature suggest stable but modest revenue streams, likely funded by member contributions or public support. The website's clear structure and professional content support effective communication with its target audience of cooperative members and administrators.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate security posture with HTTPS enabled and a cookie consent mechanism in place, supporting GDPR compliance. However, the absence of DNSSEC, security headers (CSP, X-Frame-Options, etc.), and a published security or incident response policy indicates areas for improvement. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the content. The lack of a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file limits transparency for security researchers. Overall, the security maturity is adequate for the site's informational nature but should be enhanced to protect user data and improve trust. Incident response readiness is unclear due to missing contact channels for security issues. The site would benefit from publishing explicit security policies and contact points for abuse or security incidents.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to enhance DNS security and prevent spoofing.
  2. Implement standard security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to mitigate common web attacks.
  3. Publish a clear security policy and incident response contact information on the website.
  4. Add a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting of security issues.
  5. Regularly audit and update third-party libraries and scripts to avoid vulnerabilities.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
ARESCOP
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
ARESCOP
Description
La Révision coopérative est un service du réseau ARESCOP dédié à la révision coopérative des Scop, Scic et Coop47, offrant un regard extérieur compétent pour éclairer les coopérateurs et conforter les décisions en assemblée générale.
Key services
Révision coopérative (cooperative revision/audit), Regional support and contact, Information and guidance on cooperative governance
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Drupal 10, FontAwesome, Matomo Analytics, Tarteaucitron cookie consent
Frameworks
Drupal
Platforms
Web
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent mechanism implemented
  • No exposed sensitive data found

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Matomo
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Google Analytics (gtag), Matomo
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a professional cooperative network portal for cooperative revision services.
  2. Content is in French and well-structured with clear navigation.
  3. Multiple regional offices with physical addresses and phone numbers are listed.
  4. Cookie consent is implemented via tarteaucitron.
  5. No security.txt or explicit security policy found.
  6. No terms of service page detected.
  7. WHOIS data is consistent and domain is legitimate.
  8. No suspicious or malicious content detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on Drupal 10, a modern and widely supported CMS, ensuring a solid technical foundation. It uses FontAwesome for iconography and Matomo for privacy-focused analytics, indicating attention to user privacy. The cookie consent is managed by tarteaucitron, a GDPR-compliant tool. The site is mobile-optimized and accessible, with good SEO practices including meta tags and canonical links. Performance is moderate, likely due to multiple CSS and JS files loaded, which could be optimized. Hosting details are not explicit, limiting assessment of infrastructure robustness. No critical technical debt or outdated technologies were detected. Overall, the technical implementation supports the business goals effectively but could benefit from performance tuning and enhanced security configurations.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with revisioncooperative.coop. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review revisioncooperative.coop.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.