Skip to main content

Security report for revieweuro.com

REVIEWEURO.COM · Other · N/a

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in Email security, SSL/TLS and 2 other checks.

Security score

59/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Revieweuro.com operates as a European-focused online business directory providing local business listings and user-generated reviews across multiple European countries. The platform targets general users seeking information about local businesses, offering search functionality and the ability to add new businesses. The website is relatively small in scale, founded in 2019, and maintains a consistent brand presence with a clear business model centered on user reviews and business discovery. Technically, the website employs standard web technologies including HTML5, CSS, and JavaScript, with DNS hosted via Cloudflare and domain registration through Dynadot Inc. The site is mobile-optimized with good navigation and SEO practices, though it lacks advanced frameworks or CMS indications. Performance is moderate, and accessibility is basic but functional. From a security perspective, the site benefits from HTTPS encryption and domain transfer protection but lacks DNSSEC and important security headers, which are recommended to enhance security posture. No explicit security policies or incident response contacts are provided, which limits transparency and preparedness. Privacy compliance is basic, with a cookie consent banner and privacy policy present but no strong GDPR compliance indicators. Overall, the website presents a moderate risk profile with no critical vulnerabilities detected. Strategic improvements in security headers, DNSSEC implementation, and incident response transparency would strengthen trust and compliance. The business credibility is supported by user reviews and consistent domain registration data, though contact information is limited to user-submitted content rather than official channels.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
68/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

    • High

      No SPF record found

      SPF helps prevent email spoofing

      What to do: Add SPF record: "v=spf1 include:_spf.yourmailprovider.com ~all"

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1
    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching revieweuro.com

This scan found 26 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
57
Security headers
20
Email security
40
DNS health
70
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
68
Average
59

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Revieweuro.com occupies a niche market as a regional European business directory and review platform. Its competitive advantage lies in localized content spanning many European countries, enabling users to find and review businesses in their area. The business model likely relies on advertising revenue, as indicated by Google ad services integration. The platform targets consumers and small businesses seeking visibility and reputation management. Growth potential exists through expanding business listings and enhancing user engagement. The absence of partner or subsidiary domains suggests an independent operation. The platform's ecosystem is primarily user-driven, with limited direct business contact information, which may impact trust and conversion rates.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a foundational security posture with HTTPS and domain transfer lock enabled. However, the absence of DNSSEC and security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options exposes it to potential DNS spoofing and clickjacking risks. No incident response or security policy is published, indicating a gap in preparedness for security incidents. Data protection practices are minimal, with cookie consent implemented but no detailed GDPR compliance. The lack of verified company contact emails and incident response channels reduces transparency. Overall, the security maturity is moderate but requires enhancements to meet best practices and regulatory expectations.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to protect against DNS spoofing and improve domain security.
  2. Implement essential security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to mitigate common web vulnerabilities.
  3. Publish a detailed security policy and incident response contact information to improve transparency and readiness.
  4. Enhance privacy compliance by expanding GDPR-related disclosures and ensuring clear data retention policies.
  5. Add verified official contact information including company emails and phone numbers to improve trust and user support.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
REVIEWEURO.COM
Description
Local business listings in Euro on revieweuro.com, phone numbers, addresses, reviews
Key services
Business listings, User reviews, Search for local businesses, Business addition feature
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
HTML5, CSS, JavaScript, Cloudflare DNS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
65/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • ClientTransferProhibited domain status
  • Cookie consent mechanism

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Ad networks
Google AdSense
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a multi-country European business directory with user-generated reviews
  2. Content is accessible and well-structured with clear navigation
  3. Cookie consent banner present with opt-out mechanism
  4. No explicit security policies or incident response contacts found
  5. No security headers detected in HTML content
  6. No analytics scripts explicitly detected
  7. External links mostly to subdomains of revieweuro.com and Google ad services
  8. No social media links or company emails explicitly found
  9. Phone numbers and addresses appear only in user reviews, not as official contact details
  10. Website uses HTTPS and Cloudflare DNS but lacks DNSSEC
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a basic but effective technical infrastructure using standard web technologies without reliance on heavy frameworks or CMS platforms. Hosting and DNS are managed via Cloudflare and Dynadot, providing reliable uptime and domain management. Performance is moderate with room for optimization. The site is mobile responsive and SEO optimized with proper meta tags and canonical links. However, the absence of advanced security headers and DNSSEC indicates technical debt in security configuration. No analytics or tracking scripts beyond Google ad services are detected, suggesting limited data collection. Overall, the technical setup supports the business needs but would benefit from modernization and enhanced security controls.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with revieweuro.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review revieweuro.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.