Skip to main content

Security report for reverendjesus.com

Other · N/a

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in Email security, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

73/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website 'FSoF Cabal' appears to be a niche community or fan site hosted on the Google Sites platform. It features themed content including unique holidays, stories, and contact sections, suggesting a focus on a specific enthusiast group rather than a commercial enterprise. The site is well-structured with clear navigation and consistent branding, but lacks formal business information and contact details. Technically, the site leverages Google Sites infrastructure with Google Fonts and APIs, ensuring moderate performance and good mobile responsiveness. Security posture is basic with HTTPS enabled but no advanced security headers or policies detected. The absence of WHOIS registration data for the domain raises concerns about domain legitimacy, although hosting on Google Sites provides some trust. Privacy and cookie policies are missing, indicating low compliance with data protection regulations. Overall, the site is safe for general audiences but would benefit from improved transparency and security practices.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
50/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1

  3. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: YouTube, Google APIs

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching reverendjesus.com

This scan found 18 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
85
Security headers
70
Email security
55
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
50
Average
73

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The site targets a niche community interested in the 'FSoF Cabal' theme, offering content such as papers, stories, and a calendar of unique holidays. There is no evidence of a commercial business model, revenue streams, or partnerships. The lack of contact information and business credentials limits its credibility as a formal business entity. The site is likely maintained by enthusiasts or a small group, with limited market presence. The use of Google Sites suggests a low-cost, low-maintenance approach to web presence. Growth indicators and strategic partnerships are not evident from the available data.

Security posture

Security maturity is basic. The site uses HTTPS, which is a positive baseline. However, no security headers like Content-Security-Policy or X-Frame-Options are present, which could expose the site to certain web-based attacks. No forms or data collection mechanisms were detected, reducing risk of input-based vulnerabilities. The absence of privacy and cookie policies indicates compliance gaps with GDPR and other data protection laws. No incident response or security contact information is provided. The domain's WHOIS data is missing, which is a potential red flag for legitimacy and trust. Overall, the security posture is adequate for a low-risk informational site but lacks depth for higher assurance.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie policy to improve compliance and user trust.
  2. Add security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Content-Type-Options, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security to enhance security posture.
  3. Provide clear contact information including business emails and phone numbers to improve credibility and user support.
  4. Investigate and resolve the missing WHOIS registration data to ensure domain legitimacy and trustworthiness.
  5. Consider adding a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to demonstrate security awareness and readiness.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Description
Website appears to be a themed or community site referencing 'FSoF Cabal' with various sections such as Paper, Stories, Contact, Holydays, and Saints. The content includes many custom-named holidays and stories, suggesting a niche or fan community focus rather than a commercial business.
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Google Sites, Google Fonts, Google APIs
Platforms
Google Sites
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
basic
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is hosted on Google Sites platform.
  2. No WHOIS registration data available for the domain.
  3. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found.
  4. No contact emails or phone numbers found.
  5. No security headers detected in the HTML content.
  6. HTTPS is enabled and enforced.
  7. Content is niche community focused with many custom holidays and stories.
  8. No advertising or tracking scripts detected.
  9. No social media links or business contact information found.
  10. Site navigation is clear with multiple sections and subpages.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on Google Sites, leveraging Google Fonts and Google APIs for styling and functionality. This platform provides reliable hosting and moderate performance but limits customization and advanced technical controls. The site is mobile responsive and has clear navigation, but SEO and accessibility features are basic. No third-party analytics or advertising scripts were detected, indicating minimal tracking. The lack of security headers and privacy controls suggests technical debt in security and compliance areas. The site would benefit from enhanced technical controls and formal policies to support growth and trust.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with reverendjesus.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review reverendjesus.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.