Skip to main content

Security report for revenuehero.io

RevenueHero · Technology · Iceland

Medium risk. 3 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view and SSL/TLS.

Security score

75/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

RevenueHero is a technology SaaS company specializing in pipeline acceleration software that helps B2B marketers and sales teams convert demo requests into booked meetings efficiently. The company offers a suite of scheduling and lead qualification tools integrated with popular CRM and marketing platforms. Their market position is strong within the B2B sales enablement niche, supported by positive customer testimonials and a SOC 2 Type 2 certification. Technically, the website is built on Webflow and hosted on Vercel, with integrations for analytics and marketing tools such as HubSpot, Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel, and LinkedIn Insight Tag. The website design is professional, mobile-optimized, and content-rich, though performance is somewhat slow due to a large number of resources. Security posture is good with HTTPS, SPF, and DMARC policies in place, but improvements are recommended in HSTS and additional security headers. Privacy compliance is supported by comprehensive privacy and terms policies, though no explicit cookie consent mechanism was detected. Overall, the website is trustworthy and credible, with a medium risk profile primarily due to domain privacy protection and some security header gaps.

Scanned

This is an earlier scan of revenuehero.io. View the latest report

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
43/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      SSL Certificate Expires Soon

      SSL certificate expires in 13 days

      What to do: Renew SSL certificate before expiration

      • NIS2 21(2)(h)
      • IR 2024/2690 9.2(c): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 9.2(c): Cryptography
      • NIST SC-17: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-17: Public Key Infrastructure Certificates

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching revenuehero.io

This scan found 19 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
77
Security headers
60
Email security
85
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
43
Average
75

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention revenuehero.io, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
4
Employees
0
Customers
0
Third parties
4
Weak passwords
0%

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for revenuehero.io.

Select it in the checkout above.

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

RevenueHero targets B2B marketers, sales leaders, and revenue operations professionals with a SaaS subscription model focused on scheduling and lead routing automation. Their competitive advantages include instant qualification, balanced round robin meeting distribution, and deep CRM integration. The company demonstrates growth through customer testimonials, G2 reviews, and a clear product roadmap. The marketing ecosystem includes HubSpot and social media channels, supporting lead generation and customer engagement. The business operates from Iceland with domain privacy protection, which is typical for tech startups. No direct phone contact is provided, relying on web forms and email. The company maintains a professional online presence with consistent branding and comprehensive resource offerings.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS with modern TLS protocols and has valid SPF and DMARC DNS records configured to protect email integrity. However, it lacks HSTS enforcement and OCSP stapling, which are recommended for enhanced SSL security. No vulnerable cipher suites or known SSL vulnerabilities were detected. Security headers beyond SPF and DMARC are not evident, suggesting room for improvement in Content Security Policy and other HTTP headers. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure policy is present, limiting transparency for security researchers. Incident response contact channels are not publicly listed. Overall, the security posture is solid but could be strengthened to meet higher compliance standards and improve trust.

Recommendations

  1. Enable HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS) with includeSubDomains and preload to prevent protocol downgrade attacks.
  2. Implement OCSP stapling to improve SSL certificate revocation checking performance and security.
  3. Add comprehensive security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-XSS-Protection.
  4. Publish a security.txt file and vulnerability disclosure policy to facilitate responsible security reporting.
  5. Introduce a cookie consent banner to comply with GDPR and enhance privacy transparency.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using Webflow CMS and hosted on Vercel, leveraging modern web technologies including TLS 1.3, HubSpot marketing tools, and multiple analytics platforms. The site has a large page size (~2MB) and high resource count (269), resulting in slow load times (~19 seconds), indicating potential optimization opportunities. The site is mobile-optimized with good SEO metadata and structured navigation. JavaScript libraries include HubSpot scripts, Facebook Pixel, LinkedIn Insight Tag, and custom slider components. DNS configuration is standard with Google MX records and valid SPF and DMARC records. Domain registration is privacy protected but consistent with the business profile. Overall, the technical infrastructure is modern but could benefit from performance tuning and enhanced security configurations.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 81/100Low23 findingsView report
  2. 81/100Low23 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with revenuehero.io. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review revenuehero.io.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.