Skip to main content

Security report for retriever.lv

Latvijas Retrīveru Klubs · Other · Latvia

High risk. 10 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

42/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Latvijas Retrīveru Klubs is a small, niche non-profit organization dedicated to retriever dog breeds in Latvia. The website serves as an informational hub for breed standards, breeding kennels, available puppies, champions, health checks, training, and club events. The target audience includes retriever owners, breeders, and enthusiasts primarily in Latvia. The site is built on WordPress with common plugins and uses Google Analytics and Tag Manager for visitor tracking. While the site is functional and content-rich, it lacks modern security practices such as updated software versions and security headers. Privacy and cookie policies are absent, indicating gaps in compliance with GDPR and related regulations. Contact information is provided but limited to email and physical address, with no phone or social media presence detected. Overall, the website is moderately professional but would benefit from technical and compliance improvements.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

10 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching retriever.lv

This scan found 27 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
15
Email security
70
DNS health
75
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
10
Average
42

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The club operates in a specialized segment of the pet and animal breeding sector, focusing on retriever breeds. Its business model is community and membership-based, providing breed information, events, and health data to members and the public. The website shows partnerships with other Latvian dog organizations, enhancing its credibility and network. Revenue streams are not explicit but likely come from membership fees, event participation, and possibly breeding registrations. The club's market position is local and niche, with a consistent brand presence and good content quality. Growth indicators are not evident from the website alone. The partnership ecosystem includes national dog federations and related dog sites.

Security posture

The website has HTTPS enabled but lacks critical security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options, which are important for mitigating common web attacks. The WordPress version is outdated (4.3.34), and the jQuery library used is also an older version with known vulnerabilities, increasing risk exposure. No privacy or cookie policies are present, which is a compliance gap under GDPR. No incident response or security contact information is provided. The use of Google Analytics and Tag Manager indicates some level of user tracking but without visible privacy controls. Overall, the security maturity is low to moderate, with recommendations to update software, implement security headers, and add privacy compliance measures.

Recommendations

  1. Update WordPress core and all plugins to the latest secure versions to mitigate known vulnerabilities.
  2. Implement standard security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  3. Add a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie consent mechanism to comply with GDPR and enhance user trust.
  4. Conduct a security audit to identify and remediate any other vulnerabilities or misconfigurations.
  5. Enhance contact information with security and incident response contacts to improve transparency and readiness.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Latvijas Retrīveru Klubs
Description
Latvijas Retrīveru Klubs is a Latvian retriever dog club providing information about retriever breeds, breeding kennels, puppies, champions, health checks, training, and events related to retrievers in Latvia.
Key services
Breed standards information, Puppy listings, Health check results, Training and hunting education, Event announcements
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery 1.11.3, jQuery Migrate 1.2.1, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, WebFont Loader, WordPress 4.3.34, TablePress plugin, Superfish menu, PrettyPhoto, FitVids, Revolution Slider
Frameworks
WordPress
Platforms
WordPress CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
45/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a WordPress-based site for a Latvian retriever dog club.
  2. Content is in Latvian with English translation widget available.
  3. No privacy or cookie policies found on the homepage or linked menus.
  4. Contact email and physical address provided in footer.
  5. No phone numbers or social media links explicitly found.
  6. Uses Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager for tracking.
  7. No security headers detected; WordPress version is outdated.
  8. No forms detected on the homepage; possible forms on inner pages not analyzed.
  9. No structured data (JSON-LD or Open Graph) found in the HTML head.
  10. No WHOIS data available due to query limit error.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on an older WordPress version with several common plugins such as TablePress and Revolution Slider. It uses jQuery 1.11.3 and jQuery Migrate 1.2.1, which are outdated and potentially vulnerable. Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager are integrated for analytics and tracking. The site has moderate performance and basic mobile optimization. SEO and accessibility features are basic but present. The site lacks modern security headers and uses an older CMS version, indicating technical debt and potential risks. Hosting provider details are not discernible from the HTML content. Overall, the technical infrastructure is functional but requires modernization and security hardening.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with retriever.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review retriever.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.