Skip to main content

Security report for retina.lv

Sia Retina · Other · Latvia

Medium risk. 9 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

58/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Sia Retina is a Latvian small business specializing in professional visual advertising solutions, including LED light letters, illuminated and non-illuminated signs, advertising stands, pylons, and various sticker and banner printing services. The company targets businesses and organizations in Latvia seeking high-quality visual advertising products. The website is built on WordPress and employs common technologies such as jQuery, Google Analytics, and Google Tag Manager, indicating a moderate level of digital maturity. The site is mobile-optimized and presents content clearly with good navigation and branding consistency. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS enabled and no visible vulnerabilities, but lacks advanced security headers and published privacy or cookie policies, which are important for GDPR compliance. Overall, the website reflects a legitimate and professional small business with room for improvement in privacy and security transparency.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

9 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching retina.lv

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
15
Email security
70
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
10
Average
58

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Retina operates in the visual advertising sector within Latvia, focusing on LED and traditional signage solutions. Its business model is service-oriented, providing custom advertising products and installation. The company maintains an active social media presence on Facebook and Instagram, enhancing its marketing reach. The website content and structure suggest a stable local market position with a focus on quality and professionalism. Absence of detailed business registration data and WHOIS transparency slightly limits external trust verification. The company appears to be founded around 2018, aligning with website publication dates. No parent or subsidiary companies are indicated, suggesting an independent small business operation.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS with a valid SSL certificate, ensuring encrypted communications. However, no security headers such as Content-Security-Policy or X-Frame-Options were detected, which could improve protection against common web attacks. There is no published security policy or incident response information, limiting transparency on how security incidents are handled. No vulnerability disclosures or security.txt files were found. The use of third-party scripts like Google Analytics and Tag Manager introduces moderate tracking but no obvious security risks. Overall, the security posture is moderate but could be enhanced by implementing security headers, privacy policies, and incident response contacts.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie policy to improve GDPR compliance and user trust.
  2. Implement security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Content-Type-Options, and X-Frame-Options to enhance website security.
  3. Add a security incident response policy and contact information to improve transparency and preparedness.
  4. Regularly audit third-party scripts and plugins for vulnerabilities and update them promptly.
  5. Improve accessibility features and provide clear cookie consent mechanisms to enhance user experience and compliance.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Sia Retina
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Sia Retina
Description
Sia Retina offers professional visual environment advertising solutions including LED light letters, light boxes, aluminum constructions, neon tubes, illuminated interior and exterior objects, non-illuminated signs, advertising stands and pylons, stickers on glass and cars, car wrapping, sticker printing and cutting, banner printing and processing.
Key services
Gaismas reklāmas (Light advertising), Neizgaismotas izkārtnes (Non-illuminated signs), Stendi, piloni (Advertising stands and pylons), Cita reklāma (Other advertising including stickers and banners)
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Yoast SEO, qTranslate-XT
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • No visible exposed sensitive data
  • Use of Google Tag Manager and Analytics with async loading

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. WHOIS data unavailable due to query limit error; no registrar or domain age info extracted.
  3. Website uses HTTPS with valid SSL certificate.
  4. No privacy or cookie policy found on homepage or linked pages.
  5. Contact information is clearly presented including phone, email, and physical address.
  6. Social media presence on Facebook and Instagram with official company pages.
  7. Website built on WordPress with common plugins like Yoast SEO and qTranslate-XT for multilingual support.
  8. No visible security headers detected in provided data.
  9. No forms with sensitive data fields detected in the HTML content provided.
  10. Content is business-focused, safe, and appropriate for general audiences.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS with plugins including Yoast SEO for search engine optimization and qTranslate-XT for multilingual support. It uses jQuery and asynchronous loading of Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager scripts, indicating a modern but standard technology stack. The site is mobile-optimized with responsive design elements and good navigation clarity. Performance is moderate, with caching and optimization plugins evident from CSS and JS file naming conventions. No hosting provider information was extracted. Technical debt appears low, but improvements in accessibility and security headers are recommended to reduce risks and improve compliance.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with retina.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review retina.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.