Skip to main content

Security report for retailindetail.cz

Other · N/a

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, SSL/TLS and 1 other check.

Security score

57/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website www.retailindetail.cz is currently inaccessible or blocked, with no WHOIS data available to verify domain registration details. The site appears to be related to retail business, but the lack of accessible content and metadata prevents a thorough understanding of its business operations or market position. The technical infrastructure shows usage of common analytics and font libraries such as Google Tag Manager and LinkedIn Insight, but no further technical or CMS details are discernible. Security posture cannot be assessed due to missing security headers and SSL information. Overall, the site presents a high risk due to lack of transparency and accessibility, and no privacy or compliance policies are detected.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Critical

      Unable to retrieve SSL certificate

      Could not establish secure connection to retrieve certificate information

      What to do: Check if the server is accessible and SSL/TLS is properly configured

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching retailindetail.cz

This scan found 18 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
0
Security headers
50
Email security
80
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
25
Average
57

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Due to the absence of accessible content and WHOIS data, business intelligence is limited. The domain appears to be intended for retail-related content, but no company information, contact details, or business model insights are available. The lack of trust indicators and contact information suggests low business credibility and limited market presence. No partnerships or subsidiaries are identifiable from the data provided.

Security posture

The security posture of the website cannot be adequately evaluated. No HTTPS or SSL configuration details are available, and no security headers are detected. The absence of privacy policies, cookie consent mechanisms, or incident response contacts indicates poor compliance with data protection regulations such as GDPR. The presence of external analytics scripts without visible privacy controls further raises privacy concerns. The site may be behind a WAF or security mechanism that blocks content, which complicates security assessment.

Recommendations

  1. Establish and publish clear WHOIS domain registration information to improve trustworthiness.
  2. Ensure website content is accessible and not blocked by WAF or security mechanisms to allow proper user and security evaluation.
  3. Implement and display comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with GDPR compliance indicators.
  4. Add clear contact information including company emails, phone numbers, and physical addresses to enhance business credibility.
  5. Configure and verify HTTPS with strong SSL/TLS settings and implement security headers to improve security posture.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Generic detected. WHOIS data is unavailable and WHOIS query returned no entries; HTML content is truncated and incomplete; presence of multiple external analytics and font libraries but no substantive content; likely content blocked or inaccessible. These observations may be incomplete. For a fuller analysis, contact guard@offseq.com.

Business

Technology

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics (via Google Tag Manager), LinkedIn Insight
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Tracking pixels
LinkedIn Insight
Marketing tools
Font Awesome
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Trustworthiness
low

Key observations

  1. WHOIS data unavailable, indicating privacy protection or domain registration issues
  2. Website content is truncated and incomplete, limiting analysis
  3. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies detected
  4. No contact information or business details found
  5. External scripts include LinkedIn Insight and Google Tag Manager for analytics
  6. No security headers or SSL configuration details available
  7. No forms or data collection fields detected in provided content
  8. No social media or email contacts found
  9. Website likely blocked or inaccessible due to WAF or other security mechanisms
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses modern external libraries such as Font Awesome for icons and Google Tag Manager and LinkedIn Insight for analytics. However, the core website content is truncated and inaccessible, preventing analysis of CMS, hosting provider, or performance metrics. No forms or interactive elements are detected in the provided content. The lack of metadata and structured data further limits SEO and accessibility evaluation. The site likely suffers from technical or configuration issues that block content delivery.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with retailindetail.cz. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review retailindetail.cz.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.