Skip to main content

Security report for restosducoeur31.org

Other · N/a

Medium risk. 9 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 3 other checks.

Security score

61/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website restosducoeur31.org is currently a parked domain with no active business content. It displays a domain sale banner in Finnish and loads an iframe pointing to an unrelated external URL. There is no privacy policy, cookie policy, terms of service, or contact information available on the site. The WHOIS data is unavailable due to a malformed query and privacy protection, which limits transparency and trust. Technically, the site uses basic JavaScript and iframe embedding, hosted behind AWS Cloudfront CDN, but lacks HTTPS enforcement and security headers. The presence of multiple suspicious external domains related to ads and tracking further reduces trustworthiness. Overall, the site does not represent an active or legitimate business presence.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
50/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

9 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching restosducoeur31.org

This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
15
Email security
65
DNS health
65
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
50
Average
61

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

No identifiable business entity or services are presented on the website. The domain is parked and offered for sale, indicating no current operational business. There are no indications of market positioning, revenue streams, or partnerships. The lack of contact details and business information suggests no active customer engagement or service delivery. The domain's use of ad networks and tracking domains appears to be monetization of parking rather than genuine business activity.

Security posture

The website exhibits a low security posture. It lacks HTTPS enforcement and does not implement common security headers such as Content Security Policy or HSTS. The use of iframe to load external content from suspicious domains poses potential security risks including malicious redirects or clickjacking. No privacy or security policies are present, and no incident response or vulnerability disclosure mechanisms are found. The WHOIS privacy protection and lack of registrant transparency further reduce trust. Overall, the site is vulnerable to abuse and does not follow security best practices.

Recommendations

  1. Implement HTTPS with a valid SSL certificate to secure user connections.
  2. Add standard security headers including Content Security Policy, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options.
  3. Remove or secure iframe content to prevent malicious redirects and improve user safety.
  4. Publish clear privacy, cookie, and terms of service policies to comply with regulations and build trust.
  5. Provide verifiable contact information and business details to enhance credibility and transparency.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Description
This domain appears to be for sale and does not host active business content.
Content quality
poor
Branding
inconsistent

Technology

Stack
JavaScript, iframe
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
poor

Security

Observed score
20/100

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Ad networks
AdsDeli
Tracking pixels
youstarsbuilding.com
Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
poor
User experience
poor
Content relevance
poor
Navigation
poor
Professionalism
poor
Trustworthiness
low

Key observations

  1. Website is a parked domain with a sales banner in Finnish indicating domain is for sale.
  2. Main content is an iframe loading an external URL unrelated to the domain name.
  3. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found.
  4. No contact information or business details provided.
  5. Multiple external ad and tracking domains used, some suspicious.
  6. No HTTPS enforcement or security headers detected.
  7. WHOIS data unavailable due to malformed query and privacy protection.
  8. No business or security policies present.
  9. Content quality and professionalism are poor.
  10. No adult or explicit content detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The site uses minimal technical infrastructure primarily consisting of static HTML, CSS, and JavaScript with iframe embedding. Hosting is via AWS Cloudfront CDN, which provides reliable content delivery. However, the lack of HTTPS and security headers is a significant technical deficiency. The site is not optimized for SEO or accessibility and has poor content quality. There is no CMS or modern framework detected. Performance is moderate due to CDN usage but user experience is poor due to lack of meaningful content and navigation.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with restosducoeur31.org. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review restosducoeur31.org.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.