Skip to main content

Security report for restaurators.lv

AS "Būvuzņēmums Restaurators" · Other · Latvia

High risk. 13 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Email security and 3 other checks.

Security score

36/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

AS "Būvuzņēmums Restaurators" is a Latvian company specializing in restoration, reconstruction, artistic restoration, metalworking, and gypsum and stone formations. It positions itself as the largest and most experienced restoration company in Latvia, targeting clients needing specialized restoration services. The website content is minimal but relevant, providing basic contact information and service descriptions. The technical infrastructure is simple, relying on basic HTML, CSS, and JavaScript with Google Analytics integration. There is no evidence of modern CMS or advanced frameworks, and mobile optimization is basic. Security posture is weak due to lack of HTTPS confirmation, absence of security headers, and missing privacy and cookie policies, which also impacts GDPR compliance. No WHOIS data was available due to query limits, limiting domain trust assessment. Overall, the website is functional but requires significant improvements in security, privacy compliance, and technical modernization to enhance trust and user experience.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

13 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

  2. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  3. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • Critical

      Critical Service Exposed: MySQL

      Port 3306 (MySQL) is publicly accessible - MySQL - Database server

      What to do: Immediately restrict access to MySQL using firewall or VPN

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection

  4. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching restaurators.lv

This scan found 30 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
15
Email security
55
DNS health
75
Network security
0
GDPR outside view
10
Average
36

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet · found on this site
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company operates in the restoration and construction sector in Latvia, serving a niche market focused on restoration and artistic reconstruction. It holds a strong market position locally as the largest and most experienced player. The business model is service-oriented, with key revenue streams likely from restoration contracts and reconstruction projects. The website lacks detailed business intelligence indicators such as certifications, partnerships, or growth signals. The absence of social media and limited online presence suggests a traditional business approach with limited digital marketing. The contact information is clear and professional, supporting direct client engagement. Strategic opportunities include enhancing digital presence, improving compliance, and leveraging certifications to strengthen market credibility.

Security posture

The security posture of the website is currently weak. The absence of HTTPS or inability to confirm SSL/TLS usage is a critical issue, exposing users to potential data interception. No security headers such as Content-Security-Policy or X-Frame-Options are present, increasing risk of common web attacks. There is no visible privacy policy or cookie consent mechanism, indicating non-compliance with GDPR and related regulations. No incident response or security contact information is provided, limiting the company's ability to handle security incidents effectively. The use of Google Analytics without clear privacy disclosures further impacts privacy compliance. Overall, the website requires urgent security enhancements to protect user data and comply with legal requirements.

Recommendations

  1. Implement HTTPS with a valid SSL/TLS certificate to secure all website traffic.
  2. Add comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with clear GDPR compliance statements and consent mechanisms.
  3. Configure essential security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  4. Establish and publish an incident response policy and provide security contact channels.
  5. Modernize the website's technical stack to improve mobile optimization, accessibility, and SEO.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
AS "Būvuzņēmums Restaurators"
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
AS "Būvuzņēmums Restaurators"
Description
AS "Būvuzņēmums Restaurators" is the largest and most experienced restoration company in Latvia, specializing in restoration, reconstruction, artistic restoration, metalworking, and gypsum and stone formations.
Key services
Restoration, Reconstruction, Artistic restoration, Metalworking, Gypsum and stone formations
Content quality
basic
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
HTML, CSS, JavaScript, Google Analytics
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
30/100

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
basic
User experience
basic
Content relevance
basic
Navigation
basic
Professionalism
basic
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is accessible and not blocked by WAF or security mechanisms.
  2. WHOIS data unavailable due to query limit error; no registrar or registration details extracted.
  3. No privacy policy, cookie policy, or terms of service found on the website.
  4. Contact information including email, phone numbers, and physical address is clearly presented.
  5. Website uses Google Analytics for tracking without visible cookie consent mechanism.
  6. No security headers detected; HTTPS status unknown from provided data.
  7. Website content is minimal but relevant to restoration services in Latvia.
  8. No forms or data collection fields detected in the HTML content.
  9. No social media links found.
  10. No certifications or security policies disclosed.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses basic HTML and CSS with inline JavaScript for Google Analytics tracking. There is no evidence of a CMS or modern web frameworks. The site structure is simple, with minimal content and navigation. Performance is likely moderate but could be improved with modern optimization techniques. Mobile optimization is basic, and accessibility features are minimal. SEO is basic with meta keywords and description tags but lacks structured data or Open Graph tags. The lack of HTTPS and security headers represents a significant technical risk. The site would benefit from modernization including responsive design, enhanced accessibility, and improved security configurations.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with restaurators.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review restaurators.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.