Skip to main content

Security report for reshot.com

Reshot · Technology · Australia

Low risk. 3 critical or high findings in Security headers and SSL/TLS.

Security score

81/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Reshot is a professionally designed online platform offering free icons and vector illustrations with commercial licenses and no attribution required. It targets designers and creatives seeking high-quality design assets for personal and commercial projects. The site is linked to Envato, a well-known creative subscription company, which enhances its market credibility. Technically, the website uses modern JavaScript frameworks, error monitoring via Rollbar, and cookie consent management through Cookiebot, indicating a mature digital infrastructure. The site is fast, mobile-optimized, and SEO-friendly, providing an excellent user experience. Security-wise, HTTPS is enforced and error monitoring is active, but there is a lack of visible security headers and no published security or incident response policies. The absence of WHOIS data is a concern but is mitigated by the professional presentation and Envato affiliation. Overall, the site is trustworthy and well-maintained, with room for improvement in explicit security disclosures and contact transparency.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
83/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…
  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1
    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching reshot.com

This scan found 15 issues across 5 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
57
Security headers
60
Email security
100
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
83
Average
81

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Reshot occupies a niche in the digital design asset market by providing free, high-quality icons and illustrations with commercial licenses, differentiating itself by requiring no attribution. Its business model leverages Envato's ecosystem, likely benefiting from cross-promotion and shared resources. The target audience includes freelance designers, agencies, and creative professionals. The platform's growth potential is supported by its extensive asset library and seamless user experience. Partnerships with Envato enhance its market position and credibility. The absence of direct contact information may limit some user trust but aligns with a streamlined digital service approach.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate to strong security posture with enforced HTTPS, use of Rollbar for error monitoring, and cookie consent management compliant with GDPR. However, the lack of visible security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and Strict-Transport-Security reduces its defense-in-depth. No vulnerability disclosure or incident response information is provided, which could hinder timely security issue reporting and resolution. The absence of WHOIS data raises questions about domain registration transparency but does not directly impact site security. Overall, the security posture is adequate for the business type but could be enhanced by adopting additional best practices and transparency measures.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security to strengthen browser security.
  2. Create and maintain a security.txt file to facilitate vulnerability disclosures and improve incident response readiness.
  3. Provide clear contact information or a dedicated security contact channel for reporting security incidents.
  4. Regularly audit third-party scripts and dependencies to identify and mitigate potential vulnerabilities.
  5. Enhance transparency by publishing detailed privacy and security policies, including data retention and protection practices.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Reshot
Description
Reshot is a free resource offering over 40,000 icons and 1,500 vector illustrations, all available for instant download in formats like SVG and PNG. Designed by and for creatives, Reshot provides assets with a commercial license and no attribution required, making it ideal for both personal and professional projects.
Key services
Free SVG icons, Free vector illustrations, Instant downloads, Commercial licensing
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
JavaScript, Rollbar, Cookiebot, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Frameworks
Turbo (Hotwire)
Performance
fast
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Rollbar error monitoring
  • Cookie consent via Cookiebot

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Rollbar
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Rollbar
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and professional design
  2. No WHOIS data available, indicating possible privacy protection or domain registration issues
  3. Strong branding and clear business model linked to Envato
  4. Good privacy and cookie policies with consent mechanisms
  5. No direct contact emails or phone numbers found on the site
  6. Use of modern JavaScript frameworks and error monitoring tools
  7. No explicit security headers detected in provided data
  8. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure information found
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using modern JavaScript technologies with Turbo (Hotwire) framework for fast page transitions and dynamic content loading. It integrates third-party services such as Rollbar for error tracking, Cookiebot for cookie consent management, and Google Analytics for user behavior analysis. The site is well-optimized for performance and mobile responsiveness, with proper meta tags and SEO configurations. No CMS or hosting provider details are explicitly detected. The technical implementation reflects a mature and modern web infrastructure suitable for a digital content platform.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 81/100Low24 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with reshot.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review reshot.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.