Skip to main content

Security report for reseauhaj.org

unhaj-intranet · Government · N/a

Medium risk. 9 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 2 other checks.

Security score

59/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website www.reseauhaj.org/login serves as an intranet login portal for users with @reseauhaj.org accounts, providing access to the Unhaj intranet. It leverages Google OAuth for authentication, ensuring secure login without sharing user data beyond credentials. The site is built on WordPress with plugins such as WooCommerce and Elementor, indicating a modern CMS infrastructure. However, the absence of visible privacy and cookie policies and lack of security headers suggest areas for improvement in compliance and security hardening. The WHOIS data is unavailable due to a malformed response, limiting domain trust assessment, but the site content and technology usage indicate a legitimate organizational portal.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

9 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching reseauhaj.org

This scan found 26 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
15
Email security
70
DNS health
60
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
35
Average
59

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention reseauhaj.org, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for reseauhaj.org right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The portal targets internal users of the reseauhaj.org network, likely employees or members of the Unhaj organization. It functions primarily as an authentication gateway rather than a public-facing commercial site. The business model is internal access facilitation, with no evident revenue streams or external marketing. The partnership with Google for authentication and the site development by Improba (linked via footer) indicate a professional setup. The lack of public contact information and policies is typical for intranet portals but reduces external trust signals.

Security posture

The site enforces HTTPS and uses Google OAuth for secure authentication, which are positive security practices. However, the absence of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options reduces the overall security posture. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. The site should implement recommended security headers and conduct regular plugin updates to mitigate risks. The lack of incident response or security policy information is a gap in organizational security transparency.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to comply with GDPR and inform users.
  2. Add security headers including Content-Security-Policy, HSTS, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  3. Publish security and incident response policies with contact channels for vulnerability reporting.
  4. Regularly audit and update WordPress core and plugins to minimize vulnerabilities.
  5. Enhance transparency by providing contact information and data protection officer details if applicable.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
unhaj-intranet
Description
INTRANET portal for users with @reseauhaj.org accounts to access the Unhaj intranet. The site uses Google services for authentication but does not share user data beyond login credentials.
Key services
User authentication via Google OAuth, Access to internal intranet resources
Content quality
basic
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress 6.8.3, WooCommerce 7.9.0, Elementor, Modern Events Calendar, jQuery, Vue.js, Google OAuth, PHP
Frameworks
WordPress, WooCommerce
Platforms
WordPress CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
65/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • OAuth authentication via Google

Analytics and tracking

Services
WordPress.com Stats
Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Tracking pixels
WordPress.com Stats (stats.wp.com)
Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
basic
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is an intranet login portal for reseauhaj.org users.
  2. Uses Google OAuth for authentication.
  3. No WHOIS data available due to malformed WHOIS response.
  4. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies explicitly found.
  5. No contact emails or phone numbers publicly listed.
  6. No security headers detected in HTML content.
  7. Site uses WordPress with multiple plugins including WooCommerce and Elementor.
  8. No advertising or affiliate programs detected.
  9. Minimal tracking via WordPress.com stats.
  10. Content is in French language targeting internal users.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a WordPress CMS with Elementor page builder and WooCommerce plugin, indicating a flexible and extensible platform. It integrates Google OAuth for authentication, enhancing security and user convenience. The site loads multiple JavaScript libraries including jQuery and Vue.js, supporting dynamic content and interactivity. Performance appears moderate with good mobile optimization. However, the lack of visible security headers and privacy compliance features suggests technical debt in security and compliance areas. Hosting provider details are not discernible from the HTML content.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with reseauhaj.org. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review reseauhaj.org.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.