Skip to main content

Security report for research-in-germany.org

Deutscher Akademischer Austauschdienst e.V. (DAAD) · Government · Germany

Partial score · DNS & email only

75/100

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Research in Germany is an official information platform operated by the Deutscher Akademischer Austauschdienst e.V. (DAAD), aimed at international researchers seeking PhD, postdoc, and advanced research opportunities in Germany. The website provides comprehensive guidance on the German research landscape, funding, job portals, and practical advice for planning a stay in Germany. It is well-positioned as a trusted government-backed resource with a clear focus on academic and research sectors. Technically, the website employs modern web technologies including Alpine.js for interactivity, Google Tag Manager and Analytics for user behavior tracking with explicit consent, and a Microsoft-powered chatbot for user assistance. The site is mobile-optimized, accessible, and SEO-friendly, reflecting a mature digital infrastructure. From a security perspective, the site enforces HTTPS, uses CSRF tokens for form security, and implements GDPR-compliant cookie consent mechanisms. Data transfers to third countries (e.g., USA for Microsoft and Google services) are managed with standard contractual clauses. No critical vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected. However, explicit security headers like X-Frame-Options were not confirmed in the HTML. Overall, the website demonstrates a strong security posture, excellent content quality, and good privacy compliance. The incomplete WHOIS data is a minor concern but likely due to registry query issues rather than malicious intent. Strategic recommendations include enhancing security header implementation, publishing a security.txt for vulnerability disclosure, and maintaining regular audits of third-party integrations.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
95/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
6of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • High

      No DMARC record found

      DMARC provides email authentication and reporting

      What to do: Add DMARC record: "v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:dmarc@yourdomain.com"

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1
    • High

      SSL Certificate Expires Soon

      SSL certificate expires in 28 days

      What to do: Renew SSL certificate before expiration

      • NIS2 21(2)(h)
      • IR 2024/2690 9.2(c): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 9.2(c): Cryptography
      • NIST SC-17: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-17: Public Key Infrastructure Certificates
    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 384-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching research-in-germany.org

This scan found 14 issues across 5 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
42
Email security
52
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
95
Average
75

Not counted

  • Security headers: did not complete in this scan.
  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention research-in-germany.org, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for research-in-germany.org right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Research in Germany operates as a government-affiliated platform under DAAD, targeting international academic researchers. Its competitive advantage lies in official backing, comprehensive content, and multilingual support. The business model is informational and service-oriented, funded by public resources rather than direct revenue. The platform supports growth in international research collaboration and mobility, leveraging partnerships with German federal ministries and research institutions. The ecosystem includes funding organizations, universities, and research bodies, positioning it as a central hub for research-related information in Germany.

Security posture

The website exhibits a mature security posture with enforced HTTPS, GDPR-compliant cookie consent, and CSRF protection for forms. Use of reputable third-party services like Google Analytics and Microsoft Bot Framework is managed with appropriate user consent and data protection clauses. No critical security issues or vulnerabilities were identified in the analyzed content. The absence of explicit security headers in the HTML suggests room for improvement. Incident response and vulnerability disclosure mechanisms are not publicly evident, which could be enhanced to improve transparency and readiness.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and verify security headers such as X-Frame-Options and X-Content-Type-Options to strengthen browser security.
  2. Publish a security.txt file to provide clear vulnerability disclosure and incident response contact information.
  3. Conduct regular security audits of third-party scripts and integrations to ensure ongoing compliance and risk mitigation.
  4. Enhance visibility of contact information including dedicated security or abuse contacts to improve trust and incident handling.
  5. Maintain and update cookie and privacy policies to reflect evolving regulations and best practices.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Deutscher Akademischer Austauschdienst e.V. (DAAD)
Description
The website helps you to find your way to Germany, to seek for PhD positions, research jobs or funding opportunities.
Key services
Information on research landscape in Germany, Guidance for PhD, postdoc, advanced research careers, Funding and job search resources, On-site consultation and publications, Newsletter and events
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
HTML5, CSS, JavaScript, Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, Microsoft Bot Framework (chatbot)
Frameworks
Alpine.js (x-data, x-bind directives), Snoop Cookie Consent library
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent with GDPR compliance
  • CSRF cookie for form security
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Chatbot data processing with standard contractual clauses for US data transfer

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and navigation
  2. Strong GDPR and cookie consent implementation
  3. Use of reputable third-party analytics and chatbot services with proper consent
  4. No suspicious or malicious content detected
  5. WHOIS data incomplete but does not raise immediate red flags
  6. No direct contact emails or phone numbers found in main HTML; contact form present
  7. No security.txt or explicit vulnerability disclosure found
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern tech stack with HTML5, CSS, JavaScript, and Alpine.js for dynamic UI components. It integrates Google Tag Manager and Analytics for tracking, with user consent mechanisms in place. The chatbot functionality is powered by Microsoft services, with data transfers governed by GDPR-compliant clauses. The site is mobile-optimized and accessible, with good SEO practices including meta tags and structured navigation. Performance is moderate, with potential for optimization in loading speed. No CMS was explicitly detected, suggesting a custom or static site architecture.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with research-in-germany.org. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review research-in-germany.org.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.