Skip to main content

Security report for rera.cz

RERA a.s. · Government · Czech Republic

Medium risk. 12 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 3 other checks.

Security score

55/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

RERA a.s. is a regional development agency focused on supporting the economic, social, and cultural growth of the South Bohemian Region since 1999. The organization operates as a partnership of regional entities and offers services including conceptual studies, grant application processing, project management, and international cooperation. The website reflects a small-sized, government/non-profit entity with a clear regional focus and a history of international projects. Technically, the website employs modern frontend technologies such as Bootstrap, jQuery, and Google Tag Manager, indicating a moderate level of digital maturity. The site is mobile-optimized and provides a good user experience, although some backend issues are evident from visible PHP warnings. SEO and accessibility are basic but functional. From a security perspective, the site uses HTTPS but lacks visible security headers and exposes a PHP warning, which could leak information. No privacy or cookie policies are present, indicating gaps in compliance with GDPR and other privacy regulations. The absence of WHOIS data reduces domain trustworthiness, although the website content and contact details appear legitimate. Overall, the website is functional and professional but requires improvements in backend error handling, security headers, and privacy compliance to enhance trust and security posture.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

12 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching rera.cz

This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
20
Email security
65
DNS health
70
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
10
Average
55

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

RERA a.s. holds a stable position as a regional development agency with over two decades of experience. Its business model centers on partnership and project facilitation within the South Bohemian Region, targeting government bodies, regional stakeholders, and international partners. The agency's revenue streams likely derive from government funding, grants, and project management fees. The presence of international projects suggests active engagement in cross-border cooperation. The company maintains a modest size with a focused regional scope, supported by clear contact information and a professional web presence. However, the lack of visible certifications or security policies may limit perceived credibility among some stakeholders.

Security posture

The current security posture is moderate but with notable weaknesses. The use of HTTPS is a positive baseline, but the absence of security headers such as Content Security Policy, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options reduces protection against common web attacks. The visible PHP warning error exposes internal implementation details, which could aid attackers. No incident response or security policy information is publicly available, indicating limited transparency and preparedness. Privacy compliance is weak due to missing privacy and cookie policies. Overall, the site would benefit from enhanced security controls, error handling, and compliance documentation to reduce risk and improve stakeholder confidence.

Recommendations

  1. Resolve all backend PHP errors and warnings to prevent information leakage.
  2. Implement comprehensive security headers including CSP, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options.
  3. Publish clear privacy and cookie policies to improve GDPR compliance.
  4. Establish and disclose incident response and security policies.
  5. Obtain and display relevant certifications or trust seals to enhance credibility.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
RERA a.s.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
RERA a.s.
Description
The Regional Development Agency of South Bohemia was launched on 22 January 1999 on the principle of partnership of individual regional entities operating in South Bohemia, with the aim of supporting the economic, social and cultural development of the South Bohemian Region.
Key services
Conceptual, development and demographic studies, Grant application processing and project management, International activities
Content quality
good
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
Bootstrap, jQuery, Font Awesome, Owl Carousel, Google Fonts, Google Tag Manager (gtag.js)
Frameworks
Bootstrap
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
55/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS usage implied by URLs (https://)
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is accessible and not blocked by WAF or security mechanisms
  2. PHP warning error visible in HTML source indicates some backend issues
  3. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found on main page
  4. Contact information is clearly presented with email, phone, physical address, and contact form
  5. WHOIS data is missing or unavailable, which is a concern for domain legitimacy
  6. Website uses modern frontend technologies and Google Tag Manager for analytics
  7. No visible security headers detected; SSL status unknown
  8. Content is professional and relevant to regional development
  9. No adult or questionable content detected
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a standard modern frontend stack with Bootstrap and jQuery, supported by Google Fonts and Font Awesome for styling and icons. Google Tag Manager is used for analytics and marketing tracking. The site is mobile responsive and has a clear navigation structure. However, the presence of PHP warnings suggests backend code quality issues. No CMS or hosting provider information is evident. Performance is moderate, with no explicit optimization indicators. SEO is basic with meta tags present but no advanced structured data or Open Graph tags detected. Accessibility features are minimal but present. Overall, the technical implementation is functional but could be improved by addressing backend errors and enhancing SEO and accessibility.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with rera.cz. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review rera.cz.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.