Skip to main content

Security report for renomia.hu

RENOMIA · Other · Hungary

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

65/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

RENOMIA is a well-established international insurance brokerage and risk management company specializing in corporate, industrial, and community insurance solutions. The company operates in multiple countries with a strong presence in Hungary and neighboring regions, offering tailored insurance products across various economic sectors such as automotive, energy, agriculture, and construction. Their business model focuses on providing professional risk management and insurance brokerage services supported by a network of subsidiaries and partner companies. Technically, the website is built on a modern CMS platform (Solidpixels) with integration of Google Tag Manager and cookie consent mechanisms, ensuring compliance with privacy regulations. The site is mobile-optimized, well-structured, and provides multilingual support, enhancing user experience and accessibility. Performance is moderate with good SEO practices implemented. From a security perspective, the site enforces HTTPS and includes cookie consent banners, but lacks explicit security policies and incident response contact details. No critical vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected. The domain registration details align with the business claims, supporting legitimacy and trustworthiness. Overall, RENOMIA's digital presence reflects a professional and credible organization with room for improvement in formalizing security policies and incident response readiness. The risk to users and business operations is low, and the company demonstrates good compliance with privacy and data protection standards.

Scanned

This is an earlier scan of renomia.hu. View the latest report

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
40/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Google Analytics, Facebook, Twitter, LinkedIn, YouTube, Google APIs

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching renomia.hu

This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
42
Security headers
55
Email security
70
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
40
Average
65

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

RENOMIA holds a strong market position as a regional leader in insurance brokerage and risk management services, leveraging a network of subsidiaries across Central and Eastern Europe. Their competitive advantage lies in specialized sector expertise and global insurance service capabilities. The business model is B2B focused, targeting corporate clients requiring tailored insurance solutions. Revenue streams likely include brokerage commissions and consulting fees. The company shows growth through international expansion and diversified service offerings. Partnerships with specialized insurance entities and online platforms enhance their ecosystem. Strategic observations include the importance of maintaining compliance with evolving regulations and enhancing digital security to sustain market trust.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a mature security posture with HTTPS enforced and cookie consent mechanisms in place, indicating awareness of privacy and security best practices. However, the absence of published security policies and incident response contacts suggests gaps in transparency and readiness. No vulnerable libraries or exposed sensitive data were found, and the use of modern web technologies reduces risk. Compliance with GDPR is evident through privacy and cookie policies. To improve, RENOMIA should formalize security governance documentation, implement security headers, and provide clear incident reporting channels. These steps will strengthen their security culture and reduce potential business impact from security incidents.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a comprehensive security policy and make it accessible on the website.
  2. Add dedicated incident response contact information (e.g., security@ or abuse@ email).
  3. Implement HTTP security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Content-Type-Options.
  4. Conduct regular security audits and vulnerability scans to identify and remediate risks.
  5. Enhance accessibility features to improve compliance and user experience for all visitors.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
RENOMIA
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
RENOMIA
Description
RENOMIA is an international expert in risk management, corporate, industrial, and community insurance solutions, specializing in various economic sectors including automotive, food industry, energy, construction, aviation, agriculture, and chemical/plastic industries.
Key services
Risk management, Corporate insurance, Industrial insurance, Employee benefits, Global insurance services
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Google Tag Manager, Cookie Script, Modernizr, Solidpixels CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent mechanism implemented
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics (via Google Tag Manager)
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Marketing tools
Cookie Script
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is professionally designed and content-rich.
  2. Clear multilingual support with alternate hreflang links.
  3. Comprehensive cookie consent and privacy policy present.
  4. Contact information is clearly provided including hotline and address.
  5. No visible security policy or incident response information.
  6. Use of modern web technologies and CMS.
  7. Strong branding and consistent corporate identity.
  8. No suspicious or malicious content detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on the Solidpixels CMS platform, utilizing modern JavaScript libraries such as Modernizr and Google Tag Manager for analytics and tracking. The site employs responsive design techniques and supports multiple languages via hreflang tags. Performance is moderate, with room for optimization in loading speed and accessibility. The technical implementation includes asynchronous loading of scripts and a cookie consent framework, demonstrating adherence to privacy standards. There is no evidence of legacy or vulnerable technologies. Opportunities exist to improve SEO further and enhance security headers to reduce technical risks.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 71/100Medium30 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with renomia.hu. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review renomia.hu.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.