Skip to main content

Security report for renomia.bg

RENOMIA · Other · Bulgaria

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in Security headers and SSL/TLS.

Security score

68/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

RENOMIA is a professional insurance brokerage and risk management company operating primarily in Bulgaria with a strong international presence through its group subsidiaries. The company specializes in corporate insurance solutions across multiple business sectors including energy, transport, healthcare, real estate, manufacturing, and agriculture. Their website is well-structured, localized in Bulgarian, and provides comprehensive information about their services, client testimonials, and international reach. The company maintains a professional market position supported by awards and a consistent brand image. Technically, the website uses modern web technologies including Google Tag Manager for analytics, Cookie Script for consent management, and a proprietary CMS platform (Solidpixels). The site is mobile optimized with good SEO and accessibility basics. Performance is moderate with no critical technical issues detected. From a security perspective, the site enforces HTTPS and implements cookie consent mechanisms aligned with GDPR requirements. However, explicit security headers are not detected, and no public security or incident response policies are published. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were found in the HTML content. The WHOIS data confirms the legitimacy and consistency of the domain registration with the business claims. Overall, RENOMIA's digital presence reflects a mature and trustworthy insurance brokerage firm with good compliance and security posture. Strategic improvements could include enhanced security headers, published security policies, and improved accessibility features to further strengthen their digital trust and compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
88/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…
  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1
    • High

      SSL Certificate Expires Soon

      SSL certificate expires in 0 days

      What to do: Renew SSL certificate before expiration

      • NIS2 21(2)(h)
      • IR 2024/2690 9.2(c): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 9.2(c): Cryptography
      • NIST SC-17: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-17: Public Key Infrastructure Certificates
    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching renomia.bg

This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
32
Security headers
55
Email security
70
DNS health
65
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
88
Average
68

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention renomia.bg, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for renomia.bg right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

RENOMIA operates as an essential entity in the insurance brokerage sector, targeting corporate clients and businesses requiring risk management and insurance solutions. Their business model revolves around providing tailored insurance products and risk advisory services across diverse industries. The company benefits from a broad partnership ecosystem within the RENOMIA Group, including subsidiaries focused on agro, benefit programs, European partners, and network services. Their market positioning is strong in Bulgaria and neighboring countries, supported by client testimonials and industry awards. The website content and structure indicate a focus on professional corporate clients, with growth potential through international services and employer programs.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a good security posture with mandatory HTTPS encryption and a GDPR-compliant cookie consent mechanism. No critical vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive information were identified. However, the absence of explicit security headers such as Content Security Policy (CSP), HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS), and X-Frame-Options suggests room for improvement. There is no publicly available security policy or incident response contact information, which could enhance transparency and readiness. The use of third-party scripts like Google Tag Manager and Cookie Script is standard but requires ongoing monitoring for vulnerabilities. Overall, the security maturity is good but could be elevated with additional best practices and published policies.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and enforce security headers including CSP, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options to mitigate common web attacks.
  2. Publish a formal security policy and provide clear incident response contact channels to improve transparency and trust.
  3. Establish a vulnerability disclosure program or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting of security issues.
  4. Enhance website accessibility features to comply with WCAG standards and improve user experience for all visitors.
  5. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts and libraries to minimize security risks and maintain compliance.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
РЕНОМИА ООД.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
RENOMIA
Description
Експерти в управлението на риска, корпоративно застраховане, индустрии, градове навсякъде по света.
Key services
Risk management, Corporate insurance solutions, International insurance services, Employer programs
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Google Tag Manager, Cookie Script, Modernizr, Swiper.js
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent mechanism
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics (via Google Tag Manager)
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Marketing tools
Cookie Script
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is professionally designed and localized in Bulgarian.
  2. Strong focus on corporate insurance and risk management.
  3. Multiple international related domains and subsidiaries.
  4. Comprehensive cookie and privacy policies with consent mechanism.
  5. No signs of security blocking or WAF interference.
  6. Social media presence on Facebook, YouTube, Twitter, LinkedIn.
  7. Client testimonials and awards enhance trust.
  8. No exposed sensitive data or obvious vulnerabilities in HTML.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on the Solidpixels CMS platform and leverages modern web technologies such as Google Tag Manager for analytics and Cookie Script for cookie consent management. The HTML structure is valid and includes comprehensive meta tags and Open Graph data for SEO and social media integration. The site is mobile responsive with good navigation clarity and professional design. Performance is moderate, with room for optimization in image loading and script management. No major technical debt or legacy technologies were detected. The hosting provider is not explicitly identified in the HTML content. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports a stable and professional online presence.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 62/100Medium33 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with renomia.bg. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review renomia.bg.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.