Skip to main content

Security report for renholmen.se

Renholmen AB · Manufacturing · Sweden

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, SSL/TLS and 1 other check.

Security score

52/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Renholmen AB is a Swedish manufacturing company specializing in the design and delivery of high-technology machines with automated solutions for wood handling. Established in 1952 and part of the ARA Technology Group under Storskogen AB, Renholmen serves industrial clients primarily in the wood processing sector. Their key services include project-based machine design, automation, and ongoing service and spare parts support. The company maintains a strong market position with a focus on engineering excellence and sustainability. Technically, the website is built on WordPress with modern SEO and accessibility features, integrating Cookiebot for GDPR-compliant cookie management and Google Analytics for traffic analysis. Security posture is solid with HTTPS and cookie consent mechanisms, though explicit security headers and incident response policies are absent. Overall, the website reflects a professional and trustworthy business presence with clear contact information and active social media engagement.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
58/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      No HTTPS encryption

      GDPR requires appropriate security measures for personal data

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate for HTTPS

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Critical

      No HTTPS Encryption

      Website does not use HTTPS encryption, making all data transmission vulnerable to interception

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate and redirect all HTTP traffic to HTTPS

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching renholmen.se

This scan found 22 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
0
Security headers
15
Email security
75
DNS health
65
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
58
Average
52

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Renholmen operates in the manufacturing sector with a B2B business model targeting wood processing and industrial clients. The company leverages its long history and affiliation with ARA Technology Group to maintain competitive advantages in engineering and automation. Revenue streams likely include machine sales, project engineering, and service contracts. The website content and news updates indicate ongoing growth and investment in technology and personnel. Partnerships with parent company Storskogen AB and presence on major social platforms support brand visibility and trust. The company emphasizes sustainability certification, enhancing its market appeal. Strategic observations suggest a focus on innovation and customer-centric solutions in a niche industrial market.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a mature security posture with enforced HTTPS and a comprehensive cookie consent mechanism via Cookiebot, supporting GDPR compliance. No sensitive data is exposed in the HTML content. However, the absence of explicit security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options represents an area for improvement. There is no published security policy or incident response contact information, which could hinder transparency and readiness in case of security incidents. No vulnerability disclosures or security.txt files are present, limiting external security collaboration. Overall, the security measures are adequate for the website's scope but could be enhanced to align with best practices and regulatory expectations.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish explicit security headers including Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options to mitigate common web vulnerabilities.
  2. Develop and make accessible a formal security policy and incident response contact to improve transparency and preparedness.
  3. Consider adding a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting of security issues.
  4. Enhance privacy policy visibility and detail to fully comply with GDPR and inform users about data processing practices.
  5. Regularly audit third-party scripts and libraries to ensure no vulnerabilities or outdated components are present.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Renholmen AB
Registration number
556085-2096
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Renholmen AB
Description
Vi designar och levererar högteknologiska maskiner med automatiserade lösningar för virkeshantering i projekt, samt tillhandahåller service, uppgraderingar och reservdelar.
Key services
Design and delivery of high-tech machines, Automated solutions for wood handling, Service, upgrades, and spare parts
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Yoast SEO, Cookiebot, Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, Vimeo embed
Frameworks
Bootstrap (implied by classes), Swiper.js (carousel)
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent with Cookiebot
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Google Ads
Tracking pixels
Cookiebot session tracker
Marketing tools
Cookiebot
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website uses Cookiebot for GDPR-compliant cookie consent
  2. No explicit privacy policy page found but cookie declaration is detailed
  3. Contact information is clearly presented with phone and postal address
  4. Social media presence is active and linked
  5. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure found
  6. Website is professionally designed and well structured
  7. Uses modern web technologies and SEO best practices
  8. No signs of blocking or WAF interference
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress with a modern theme and uses popular plugins such as Yoast SEO and Cookiebot. It integrates Google Tag Manager and Google Analytics for marketing and analytics purposes. The site uses Swiper.js for carousels and embeds videos via Vimeo and YouTube. Performance is moderate with lazy loading images and responsive design ensuring good mobile experience. Accessibility features like skip links and ARIA roles are implemented. The technical stack is current and well maintained, though hosting provider details are not explicit. There is opportunity to improve security headers and formalize security documentation. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports a professional and user-friendly web presence aligned with business goals.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with renholmen.se. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review renholmen.se.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.