Skip to main content

Security report for rengl.cz

RENGL, s.r.o. · Other · Czech Republic

High risk. 9 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

45/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

RENGL, s.r.o. is a medium-sized company specializing in outdoor advertising services, primarily poster posting campaigns across the Czech Republic, Slovakia, and Poland. They operate the largest own network of 5,000 poster sites in 170 cities, offering comprehensive services including poster printing, transport, and maintenance. The website is professionally designed with good content quality and clear navigation, targeting businesses and organizations seeking effective outdoor advertising solutions in Central Europe. Technically, the site uses modern JavaScript libraries such as jQuery, Lightbox, and Slick Carousel, providing a responsive and user-friendly experience. However, some accessibility features could be improved. Security posture is moderate with HTTPS assumed but lacking explicit security headers and cookie consent mechanisms. The absence of WHOIS data reduces domain trust assessment confidence, though the website content and contact details appear legitimate. Overall, RENGL presents a credible business with room for security and privacy enhancements.

Scanned

This is an earlier scan of rengl.cz. View the latest report

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

9 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching rengl.cz

This scan found 26 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
15
Email security
70
DNS health
75
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
25
Average
45

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

RENGL holds a strong market position as a leading operator of poster advertising networks in Central Europe. Their business model focuses on providing end-to-end poster campaign services, including printing and glue sales, targeting advertisers and event organizers. The company maintains regional partner sites for Slovakia and Poland, indicating a multi-country operational footprint. Revenue streams likely derive from campaign services, printing, and glue sales. The website reflects a professional brand with consistent messaging and trust indicators such as GDPR compliance and detailed contact information. Growth potential exists through digital marketing enhancements and expanded service offerings. The partnership ecosystem includes regional sister sites and specialized portals for campaign management and logistics.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate security maturity level with HTTPS usage and secure form submission methods. However, the lack of security headers such as Content Security Policy, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options is a notable gap. No explicit security or incident response policies are published, and no dedicated security contact channels are provided. The site does not implement a cookie consent mechanism, which is a GDPR compliance concern. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. The use of multiple third-party JavaScript libraries necessitates regular vulnerability assessments. Overall, the security posture is functional but requires improvements to align with best practices and regulatory requirements.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive security headers including CSP, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  2. Add a cookie consent banner and detailed cookie policy to ensure full GDPR compliance and improve user transparency.
  3. Publish a formal security policy and incident response plan with clear contact channels for reporting security issues.
  4. Conduct regular security audits of third-party libraries and update them to mitigate vulnerabilities.
  5. Enhance website accessibility features to improve usability for all users and comply with accessibility standards.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
RENGL, s.r.o.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
RENGL, s.r.o.
Description
RENGL provides poster posting services with a network of 5,000 poster sites across Czech Republic, Slovakia, and Poland. They offer poster printing, transport, and maintenance services for advertising campaigns.
Key services
Poster posting campaigns, Poster printing, Glue sales
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery 3.6.0, Lightbox, Slick Carousel, jQuery DataTables, Uploadify, SWFObject
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • Use of HTTPS assumed (URL is https)
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Forms use POST method

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content in Czech language.
  2. No privacy or cookie banner detected despite GDPR page presence.
  3. Contact form collects personal data with basic validation.
  4. No social media links found on the homepage.
  5. No explicit security headers detected in HTML content.
  6. WHOIS data unavailable, limiting domain trust assessment.
  7. Website uses multiple JavaScript libraries for UI and interactivity.
  8. Business operates in outdoor advertising sector in Central Europe.
Technical notes

Notes

The website employs a mature technology stack with jQuery 3.6.0, Lightbox for image galleries, Slick Carousel for sliders, and jQuery DataTables for tabular data presentation. The presence of Uploadify and SWFObject indicates legacy support for file uploads and Flash content, which may require modernization. The site is mobile responsive with good SEO meta tags and structured navigation. Performance is moderate, with potential improvements in loading speed and accessibility. No CMS was detected, suggesting a custom or proprietary platform. Hosting provider details are not available from the provided data. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports the business needs but could benefit from modernization and enhanced security configurations.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 45/100High35 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with rengl.cz. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review rengl.cz.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.