Skip to main content

Security report for rency.cz

Rency s.r.o. · Other · Czech Republic

Medium risk. 9 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Email security and 2 other checks.

Security score

58/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Rency s.r.o. is a Czech design-driven company specializing in branding, visual identity, and web design services. With over 13 years of experience, they target successful firms seeking to enhance their brand presence and competitive advantage. The website reflects a professional and consistent brand image, showcasing client testimonials, case studies, and a portfolio of services. Technically, the site is built on Webflow and leverages modern JavaScript libraries such as GSAP and Swiper, with fast loading times and excellent mobile optimization. Security-wise, the site uses HTTPS and modern analytics tools but lacks some security headers and explicit incident response contacts. Privacy and cookie policies are present but do not include a consent mechanism. The absence of WHOIS data for the domain raises concerns about domain registration transparency, impacting trustworthiness despite the professional web presence.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

9 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching rency.cz

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
30
Email security
40
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
25
Average
58

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention rency.cz, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for rency.cz right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Rency operates as a boutique design consultancy focusing on branding and digital identity for medium to large private companies across various sectors. Their business model centers on providing tailored visual communication solutions, including logos, visual styles, and websites. The company maintains a strong market position in the Czech Republic with a portfolio of reputable clients and positive testimonials. Their digital presence is supported by modern web technologies and marketing tools, indicating a mature digital strategy. However, the lack of publicly available domain registration data could be a risk factor in partnership or vendor evaluations.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate security posture with HTTPS enforced and no visible sensitive data exposure. However, it lacks several recommended security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options, which could mitigate certain attack vectors. There is no explicit security policy or incident response contact information, which limits transparency and preparedness communication. The use of third-party analytics and tracking pixels is standard but requires proper privacy disclosures and consent mechanisms to ensure compliance. Overall, the security maturity is adequate for a design consultancy but could be improved to align with best practices.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  2. Add a cookie consent mechanism to comply with GDPR and enhance user privacy transparency.
  3. Publish a clear security policy and provide incident response contact channels such as security@ or abuse@ emails.
  4. Investigate and resolve the lack of WHOIS domain registration data to improve domain trustworthiness.
  5. Regularly audit third-party scripts and tracking tools to ensure minimal privacy impact and compliance.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Rency s.r.o.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Rency s.r.o.
Description
Jsme designérské studio zaměřené na vizuální komunikaci a brand.
Key services
Logotyp, Vizuální styl, Webové stránky
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
GSAP, Swiper, jQuery, Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel
Platforms
Webflow
Performance
fast
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of modern JS libraries

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics (via Google Tag Manager), Facebook Pixel
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and professional design.
  2. No WHOIS data available, indicating possible domain registration issues or privacy protection.
  3. No explicit security policies or incident response contacts found.
  4. Privacy and cookie policies are present but lack explicit consent mechanisms.
  5. Contact information is clearly provided with company email, phone, and address.
  6. Use of modern web technologies and analytics tools is evident.
  7. No signs of adult or questionable content.
  8. No detected WAF or blocking mechanisms.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using Webflow CMS, enhanced with GSAP for animations and Swiper for interactive sliders. It uses jQuery and integrates Google Tag Manager and Facebook Pixel for analytics and marketing. Hosting is via Amazon CloudFront CDN, ensuring fast content delivery. The site is mobile-optimized with responsive design and accessibility features such as focus-visible outlines. SEO is supported by proper meta tags and Open Graph data. Performance is fast with optimized images and asynchronous script loading. Technical debt appears low, but security header implementation and privacy consent mechanisms are areas for improvement.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 41/100High35 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with rency.cz. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review rency.cz.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.