Skip to main content

Security report for renaterose.com

RENATE ROSE · E-commerce · Latvia

Low risk. 3 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view and SSL/TLS.

Security score

78/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

RENATE ROSE is a Latvian-based e-commerce business specializing in high-quality women's clothing made from natural materials. Founded in 2019, the company positions itself in a niche market emphasizing elegance and craftsmanship. The website is built on the Shopify platform, leveraging modern e-commerce technologies and integrations such as Judge.me for customer reviews and Omnisend for marketing automation. The digital infrastructure is mature with good mobile optimization and SEO practices. Security posture is solid with HTTPS enforced and domain protection statuses active, though DNSSEC is not enabled and some security headers could be improved. Privacy compliance is strong, featuring comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with user consent mechanisms. Overall, the website presents a professional and trustworthy online presence with a good balance of business and technical maturity.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
85/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1
    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching renaterose.com

This scan found 19 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
57
Security headers
75
Email security
70
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
85
Average
78

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company targets women seeking elegant, natural-material clothing, offering knitted dresses, sweaters, jackets, and specialized collections like wedding and linen lines. The business model is direct-to-consumer e-commerce with a focus on quality and customer experience, supported by strong customer reviews and social media presence. The use of Shopify and integrated marketing tools indicates a scalable and modern approach. No parent or subsidiary companies were identified, suggesting a small to medium-sized independent business. The presence of multiple language alternates suggests an international or European market focus.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS and uses domain status locks to prevent unauthorized changes. However, DNSSEC is not enabled, which could expose the domain to DNS spoofing attacks. No explicit security policies or incident response contacts are published, and no vulnerability disclosure or security.txt file is present. Third-party scripts and tracking pixels are used extensively, which requires ongoing monitoring for vulnerabilities. Cookie consent and privacy policies indicate GDPR awareness. Overall, the security posture is good but could be enhanced with additional DNS and header protections and formalized security policies.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to improve DNS security and prevent spoofing.
  2. Publish a security.txt file to provide a clear vulnerability disclosure channel.
  3. Implement additional HTTP security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  4. Provide explicit security policy and incident response contact information on the website.
  5. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts and tracking pixels to mitigate vulnerabilities.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
RENATE ROSE
Description
High-quality clothes for women, created in Latvia, designed with love.
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Shopify, JavaScript, CSS variables, LazySizes (lazy loading images), Judge.me reviews app, TriplePixel tracking, Omnisnippet, MakeCommerce shipping solution, Shopify Payments, Apple Pay
Frameworks
Shopify Liquid (implied), Shopify storefront APIs
Platforms
Shopify
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of clientDeleteProhibited and other domain status flags
  • Cookie consent banner present
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Shopify Trekkie, Google Analytics, Judge.me analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
TriplePixel, Judge.me, Omnisend, Facebook Pixel, Google Analytics (via Shopify Trekkie)
Marketing tools
Omnisend, Judge.me, Shopify marketing pixels
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a professionally designed Shopify e-commerce store selling women's clothing
  2. Strong customer review presence with Judge.me integration
  3. Comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with consent mechanism
  4. No signs of malicious or suspicious activity
  5. Use of multiple third-party marketing and analytics tools
  6. No direct contact emails or phone numbers found in provided HTML
  7. Domain registration and hosting consistent with business profile
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses Shopify as its CMS and e-commerce platform, with a modern tech stack including JavaScript modules, lazy loading images, and CSS variables. Performance is moderate with good mobile optimization and SEO metadata. The site integrates multiple third-party services for reviews, marketing, and payment processing. Hosting is via Shopify CDN, with domain registration through GoDaddy. Accessibility features are basic and could be improved. The technical implementation is solid but could benefit from enhanced security headers and DNS protections.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with renaterose.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review renaterose.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.