Skip to main content

Security report for renards.cz

Renards · Other · Czech Republic

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in Network security, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

56/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Renards is a Czech-based consulting firm specializing in EU subsidy and grant advisory services. The company offers comprehensive support in preparing funding applications and provides expert guidance across a broad spectrum of EU funding areas. Their target audience primarily includes businesses and organizations seeking financial support from EU programs. The website reflects a small-sized enterprise with a professional online presence, established since at least 2018. Technically, the website is built on WordPress and leverages modern tools such as Yoast SEO for search optimization, Google Tag Manager for analytics, and Cookiebot for cookie consent management. The site demonstrates good mobile optimization and a moderate performance profile. However, some technical improvements could be made, such as implementing additional security headers and publishing explicit privacy and security policies. From a security perspective, the site enforces HTTPS and uses a comprehensive cookie consent mechanism with granular user controls, indicating a good privacy compliance posture. No critical vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected. The absence of WHOIS data limits the ability to fully verify domain legitimacy, but the overall digital footprint and business content suggest a legitimate and trustworthy operation. Overall, Renards presents a solid digital presence with room for enhancements in privacy transparency and security hardening. The business appears credible and focused on its niche market, with a well-structured website supporting its consulting services.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
88/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • High

      High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP

      Port 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer

      What to do: Consider restricting access to FTP or implementing strong authentication

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching renards.cz

This scan found 22 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
52
Security headers
15
Email security
82
DNS health
80
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
88
Average
56

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention renards.cz, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for renards.cz right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Renards operates in the niche market of EU funding consultancy, providing specialized services in grant application processing and advisory. Their competitive advantage lies in their comprehensive coverage of EU subsidy areas and personalized consulting approach. The business model is service-based, targeting SMEs and organizations requiring expert assistance in navigating EU funding mechanisms. Revenue streams likely derive from consulting fees and project management services. The company maintains a focused partnership ecosystem with technology providers like Google and Cookiebot for analytics and compliance. Growth indicators include a professionally maintained website with SEO optimization and active cookie compliance, suggesting awareness of regulatory requirements and digital marketing. Strategic observations highlight the need for enhanced transparency in privacy and security policies to strengthen client trust and regulatory compliance.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a mature security posture with mandatory HTTPS encryption and a robust cookie consent framework that complies with GDPR requirements. The use of Cookiebot enables detailed user consent management across multiple cookie categories, including necessary, preference, statistics, and marketing cookies. No critical security headers were detected, indicating an area for improvement to mitigate risks such as clickjacking, XSS, and content injection. There is no visible security.txt or vulnerability disclosure page, which could enhance incident response readiness. The absence of exposed credentials or sensitive data is positive. Compliance gaps include the lack of a published privacy policy and incident response contact details. Overall, the security culture appears adequate for a small consulting firm but would benefit from formalizing security policies and enhancing HTTP header protections.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive HTTP security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  2. Publish a detailed privacy policy page outlining data processing practices, user rights, and compliance with GDPR and other relevant regulations.
  3. Create and maintain a security.txt file or a dedicated vulnerability disclosure page to facilitate responsible reporting of security issues.
  4. Enhance transparency by providing explicit incident response contact information and security policies accessible to users.
  5. Regularly audit third-party scripts and cookies to ensure compliance with privacy standards and minimize unnecessary data collection.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Renards
Description
Nabízíme zpracování dotačních žádostí a poskytujeme dotační poradenství pro kompletní spektrum dotačních oblastí v rámci EU.
Key services
Zpracování dotačních žádostí, Dotační poradenství
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Yoast SEO, Google Tag Manager, Cookiebot, Contact Form 7, Ivory Search, WP Popups
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent with granular controls
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
extensive
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Meta Platforms, Inc., Google
Tracking pixels
Cookiebot, Facebook Pixel, Leady
Marketing tools
Cookiebot
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenge.
  2. WHOIS data is unavailable or privacy protected, limiting domain trust analysis.
  3. Cookie consent is implemented with detailed categories and third-party cookie disclosures.
  4. Use of modern web technologies and SEO best practices is evident.
  5. Contact information is clearly presented with phone and email.
  6. No explicit privacy policy or terms of service pages found in the scanned content.
  7. No explicit security or incident response policies published.
  8. Website targets Czech businesses seeking EU funding consultancy.
  9. No suspicious or malicious content detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is powered by WordPress CMS, utilizing popular plugins such as Yoast SEO for search engine optimization, Contact Form 7 for user inquiries, and Cookiebot for cookie consent management. Google Tag Manager is integrated for analytics and marketing tag deployment. The site loads asynchronously loaded scripts from trusted domains including Google and YouTube, supporting multimedia content and tracking. Performance is moderate with good mobile responsiveness and basic accessibility features. The site uses modern CSS and JavaScript but lacks advanced security headers. There is no explicit hosting provider information available from the HTML content. Technical debt appears low, but opportunities exist to improve security headers and formalize privacy and security documentation to reduce operational risks.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with renards.cz. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review renards.cz.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.