Skip to main content

Security report for remotely.dk

Remotely v/ Anders Hallundbæk Mortensen · Technology · Denmark

Medium risk. 10 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

54/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Remotely v/ Anders Hallundbæk Mortensen is a small freelance frontend development business based in Denmark, specializing in HTML, CSS, and JavaScript with expertise in ReactJS and VueJS. The website serves as a professional portfolio showcasing a variety of projects for notable clients, emphasizing web development, digitalization, and business-critical IT solutions. The business model is service-oriented, targeting clients needing expert frontend development and consulting. Technically, the site is built using modern frameworks including Gatsby, ReactJS, and VueJS, delivering a fast and mobile-optimized experience with good SEO practices. However, accessibility features are basic and could be improved. Security posture is moderate with HTTPS enabled but lacks security headers and DNSSEC, and no privacy or cookie policies are present, indicating gaps in compliance and security best practices. Overall, the site is professional and trustworthy but would benefit from enhanced security and privacy measures.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

10 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching remotely.dk

This scan found 27 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
52
Security headers
30
Email security
70
DNS health
60
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
10
Average
54

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company positions itself as a seasoned freelance frontend developer with over 20 years of experience, serving a niche market of clients requiring high-quality web development and consulting services. The portfolio includes reputable clients, which strengthens market credibility. The business operates independently without subsidiaries or parent companies, focusing on direct client engagements. The absence of privacy and cookie policies suggests a potential area for compliance improvement. The website content is consistent with the WHOIS data, reinforcing legitimacy. Growth potential lies in expanding compliance and security transparency to meet evolving client expectations and regulatory requirements.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS, ensuring encrypted communication, but lacks critical security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options, which are important for mitigating common web vulnerabilities. DNSSEC is not enabled, which could expose the domain to DNS spoofing attacks. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is provided, limiting transparency in security management. No forms are present, reducing attack surface from input vectors, but also indicating limited data collection. Overall, the security posture is moderate but could be significantly improved by implementing standard security headers, enabling DNSSEC, and publishing security policies.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC to protect against DNS spoofing and improve domain security.
  2. Implement essential security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  3. Publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with clear GDPR compliance and consent mechanisms.
  4. Add incident response and vulnerability disclosure information to enhance transparency and trust.
  5. Improve accessibility features to meet modern standards and broaden user inclusivity.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Remotely v/ Anders Hallundbæk Mortensen
Registration number
38124587
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Remotely v/ Anders Hallundbæk Mortensen
Description
Freelance frontender with 20+ years experience specializing in HTML, CSS, JavaScript including ReactJS and VueJS.
Key services
Web development & consulting, Digitalization of needs & processes, Development of business-critical IT solutions
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
HTML, CSS, JavaScript
Frameworks
ReactJS, VueJS, Gatsby
Performance
fast
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
65/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a professional freelance portfolio site.
  2. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found.
  3. Contact information is clearly presented with email, phone, and physical address.
  4. No forms detected on the homepage; no data collection forms present.
  5. No security headers detected; DNSSEC not enabled.
  6. Uses modern frontend frameworks and Gatsby static site generator.
  7. No analytics or tracking scripts detected.
  8. No advertising or affiliate marketing detected.
  9. Content is in Danish with some English metadata.
  10. No social media links except a Twitter handle in meta tags.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using modern frontend technologies including ReactJS, VueJS, and Gatsby, indicating a contemporary and performant technical infrastructure. The site is fast and mobile-optimized with good SEO metadata, including Open Graph and Twitter card tags. No CMS is detected, suggesting a static site approach. No analytics or tracking scripts are present, which aligns with minimal user tracking. The absence of security headers and DNSSEC represents technical debt in security configuration. Overall, the technical implementation is solid for a freelance portfolio but could benefit from enhanced security and accessibility improvements.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with remotely.dk. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review remotely.dk.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.