Skip to main content

Security report for reliex.com

Reliex · Technology · N/a

Partial score · DNS & email only

75/100

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Reliex is a technology company specializing in Jira plugins designed to enhance project management workflows through resource planning, duplicate issue detection, and notification management. The company has established a strong market presence with over 5,000 teams globally, including Fortune 500 clients, and offers its products primarily via the Atlassian Marketplace. Their website reflects a mature SaaS business model focused on productivity tools for Jira users. Technically, the site is built on Webflow and integrates modern analytics and tracking tools such as Google Analytics, Segment, and Hotjar, alongside robust bot protection via Cloudflare and Google reCAPTCHA. Security posture is strong, supported by SOC 2 Type II and ISO 27001:2022 certifications, participation in bug bounty programs, and a comprehensive cookie consent mechanism. However, the absence of explicit privacy policy and terms of service pages, as well as direct contact information, represents areas for improvement. Overall, the website is professional, secure, and trustworthy, with minor gaps in privacy compliance documentation.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
83/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
6of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

2 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1
    • High

      SSL Certificate Expires Soon

      SSL certificate expires in 18 days

      What to do: Renew SSL certificate before expiration

      • NIS2 21(2)(h)
      • IR 2024/2690 9.2(c): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 9.2(c): Cryptography
      • NIST SC-17: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-17: Public Key Infrastructure Certificates

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching reliex.com

This scan found 16 issues across 5 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Email security
75
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
83
Average
79
After the cap
75

Not counted

  • Security headers: did not complete in this scan.
  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention reliex.com, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for reliex.com right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Reliex operates in the technology sector, targeting project managers and teams using Jira for software development and project tracking. Their competitive advantage lies in offering integrated Jira add-ons that streamline resource management, reduce duplicate issues, and optimize notifications, thereby improving team productivity. The business model is SaaS-based with revenue likely generated through app sales and subscriptions on the Atlassian Marketplace. The company demonstrates growth and credibility through certifications, customer testimonials, and a global user base spanning over 80 countries. Partnerships with Atlassian Marketplace and related product sites strengthen their ecosystem. Strategic observations include the need to enhance transparency with privacy and legal documentation and to provide clearer contact channels to support customer trust and compliance.

Security posture

Reliex exhibits a mature security posture with enforced HTTPS, use of Cloudflare bot management, Google reCAPTCHA, and participation in security programs such as bug bounty and self-assessment. The presence of SOC 2 Type II and ISO 27001:2022 certifications further underscores their commitment to data security and privacy. Cookie consent is granular and user-friendly, supporting GDPR compliance. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the analyzed content. However, the lack of a published security.txt file and explicit security incident contact information limits incident response readiness. Compliance gaps include missing privacy policy and terms of service pages, which are critical for GDPR and other regulatory adherence. Overall, the security culture appears strong but could benefit from enhanced transparency and formalized disclosure mechanisms.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy page detailing data processing and GDPR compliance.
  2. Add a clear Terms of Service page to define user rights and obligations.
  3. Create and publish a security.txt file to facilitate vulnerability reporting.
  4. Provide explicit security incident contact channels such as security@ or abuse@ email addresses.
  5. Enhance HTTP security headers and make them visible for audit and compliance purposes.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Reliex
Description
Reliex software provides Jira add-ons for resource planning, capacity management, time tracking to organize team workflow in the most productive way.
Key services
ActivityTimeline (resource management and time tracking), Find Duplicates (duplicate issue detection in Jira), Email Digest (Jira notification management)
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Segment Analytics, Hotjar, Cloudflare (bot management cookies), Calendly, Google reCAPTCHA, CookieYes (cookie consent management)
Frameworks
Webflow (CMS and site builder)
Platforms
Atlassian Marketplace (for Jira apps)
Performance
fast
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
90/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of Cloudflare Bot Management
  • Google reCAPTCHA for bot protection
  • Participation in Bug Bounty program
  • SOC 2 and ISO 27001 certifications
  • Cookie consent with granular categories and opt-in/out

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Segment Analytics, Hotjar
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Segment Analytics, Hotjar
Marketing tools
Segment Analytics
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website offers Jira plugins focused on resource management, duplicate detection, and notification management.
  2. Strong emphasis on security certifications and customer trust.
  3. Comprehensive cookie consent mechanism with detailed categories and user controls.
  4. No explicit privacy policy or terms of service pages found in the provided content.
  5. No direct contact emails or phone numbers found on the main page content.
  6. Use of modern web technologies and analytics tools.
  7. Good mobile optimization and user experience.
  8. No signs of blocking or WAF challenges.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using Webflow CMS, leveraging modern JavaScript libraries and analytics tools including Google Analytics, Segment, and Hotjar. It integrates Google Tag Manager for marketing and tracking orchestration. Hosting is managed via Name.com with DNS configured through their name servers. Performance is optimized with asynchronous script loading and CDN usage for static assets. Mobile responsiveness and accessibility are well implemented, ensuring a positive user experience across devices. The technical stack is modern and well-maintained, with no visible technical debt or deprecated technologies. Opportunities exist to improve security header transparency and to formalize privacy and legal documentation within the technical infrastructure.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with reliex.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review reliex.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.