Skip to main content

Security report for related.hu

Other · Hungary

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

61/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website related.hu is currently inaccessible due to a Cloudflare Web Application Firewall (WAF) block, specifically an error 1005 indicating that the ASN of the visitor's IP is banned by the site owner. This results in minimal content availability, limited to an access denied error page with no business or contact information visible. The domain was registered recently in March 2023, suggesting a new or small entity, but no further registrant details are available to confirm legitimacy or business operations. Technically, the site uses Cloudflare for security and performance, but no additional technologies, CMS, or frameworks are detectable due to the blocked content. Security posture cannot be fully assessed, but no security headers or policies are visible on the error page. Privacy and cookie policies are absent, and no forms or user interaction elements are present. Overall, the site lacks visible trust indicators or business credibility markers.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching related.hu

This scan found 22 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
35
Email security
70
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
10
Average
61

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Due to the access restriction, no detailed business intelligence can be derived from the website content. The domain age is recent, indicating a new venture or project. The lack of contact information, policies, or business descriptions limits understanding of market positioning, business model, or target audience. The use of Cloudflare suggests an intent to secure and optimize the site, but the ASN block may impact accessibility for some users. No partnerships or related domains are identifiable from the content.

Security posture

The security posture is difficult to evaluate comprehensively due to the WAF block limiting content access. The presence of Cloudflare indicates some level of security infrastructure. However, the absence of visible security headers, privacy policies, or incident response contacts on the accessible page suggests gaps in transparency and compliance. The domain uses HTTPS as implied by Cloudflare, but no detailed SSL configuration data is available. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data are observable from the error page. Incident response readiness and security culture indicators cannot be assessed.

Recommendations

  1. Review and adjust Cloudflare WAF settings to avoid blocking legitimate users and improve accessibility.
  2. Publish clear privacy, cookie, and terms of service policies to enhance compliance and user trust.
  3. Add visible contact information including business emails and phone numbers for support and security reporting.
  4. Implement and expose security headers to improve security posture and protect users.
  5. Develop a comprehensive incident response and vulnerability disclosure policy accessible on the website.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Cloudflare detected. Access denied error 1005 page served by Cloudflare indicating ASN block by website owner. These observations may be incomplete. For a fuller analysis, contact guard@offseq.com.

Business

Content quality
poor

Technology

Stack
Cloudflare

Analytics and tracking

Services
Cloudflare Performance Radar
Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Cloudflare Performance Radar
Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
poor
User experience
poor
Content relevance
poor
Navigation
poor
Professionalism
poor
Trustworthiness
low

Key observations

  1. Website is currently inaccessible due to Cloudflare WAF blocking access based on ASN 24940.
  2. No visible business or contact information on the landing page.
  3. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found.
  4. No forms or user input fields present on the page.
  5. No social media or email contact information found.
  6. Website uses Cloudflare for security and performance.
  7. Minimal content available due to access restriction.
  8. No SEO or accessibility features detectable on the error page.
  9. No evidence of advertising or affiliate marketing.
  10. No security headers or explicit SSL configuration details visible.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is hosted behind Cloudflare, which provides CDN, security, and performance services. The HTML content is minimal and serves only an error page due to ASN blocking. No CMS or additional frameworks are detectable. The site lacks SEO metadata, structured data, or accessibility features in the accessible content. Performance and mobile optimization cannot be assessed from the error page. The technical implementation is basic and limited by the WAF block, indicating potential technical debt or configuration issues that impact user experience and site visibility.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with related.hu. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review related.hu.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.