Skip to main content

Security report for rekopol.pl

REKOPOL Organizacja Odzysku Opakowań S.A. · Other · Poland

Medium risk. 9 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

56/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

REKOPOL Organizacja Odzysku Opakowań S.A. is a well-established Polish company specializing in managing recycling obligations for businesses introducing packaged products to the market. As the exclusive licensee of the Green Dot in Poland, it holds a strong market position with over two decades of experience and thousands of clients. The company offers a comprehensive suite of services including recycling compliance, consultancy, ecological education, and CSR initiatives, targeting businesses, municipalities, and educational institutions. The website reflects a professional and consistent brand image with clear navigation and rich content tailored to its audience. Technically, the site is built on WordPress with modern plugins and SEO optimizations, delivering a good user experience across devices. Security posture is solid with HTTPS and secure cookies, though some HTTP security headers could be improved. Privacy compliance is well addressed with clear policies and cookie consent mechanisms. Overall, the site demonstrates high business credibility and trustworthiness.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

9 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching rekopol.pl

This scan found 26 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
67
Security headers
15
Email security
70
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
10
Average
56

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

REKOPOL operates in the environmental compliance sector, focusing on packaging waste management and recycling services. Its business model revolves around providing regulatory compliance solutions, educational campaigns, and consultancy services to companies obligated by Polish and EU environmental laws. The company leverages partnerships with educational and environmental campaigns to enhance its market reach and social impact. Its client base includes approximately 3000 companies and nearly 720 municipalities, indicating a broad market penetration. The firm’s longevity and exclusive licensing rights position it as a market leader. Revenue streams likely include service fees for compliance management, consultancy, and educational program participation. The company maintains active communication channels and a professional digital presence, supporting growth and stakeholder engagement.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS with a valid SSL configuration, ensuring encrypted communications. It uses reputable WordPress plugins and modern JavaScript libraries, minimizing exposure to common vulnerabilities. However, the absence of explicit HTTP security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options in the HTML source suggests room for enhancement in defense-in-depth strategies. No sensitive data is exposed in the HTML, and forms appear to be standard with no visible security flaws. Incident response and security policy information are not publicly disclosed, which could be improved to demonstrate security maturity. Overall, the security posture is good but could benefit from additional hardening and transparency.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and verify HTTP security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  2. Publish a dedicated security policy and incident response contact information to improve transparency and readiness.
  3. Regularly audit and update WordPress core and plugins to mitigate vulnerabilities.
  4. Enhance accessibility features to meet higher standards for users with disabilities.
  5. Consider implementing a formal vulnerability disclosure program to engage security researchers and improve security posture.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
REKOPOL Organizacja Odzysku Opakowań S.A.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
REKOPOL Organizacja Odzysku Opakowań S.A.
Description
Realizujemy obowiązki przedsiębiorców wprowadzających na rynek produkty w opakowaniach, w tym obowiązek recyklingu, publiczne kampanie edukacyjne i inne usługi wspierające firmy w zakresie gospodarki odpadami opakowaniowymi.
Key services
Obowiązek recyklingu, Dopłaty do odpadów opakowaniowych, Edukacja ekologiczna i zielony CSR, Doradztwo opakowaniowe i międzynarodowe, Szkolenia i webinaria, Ekoprojektowanie
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Yoast SEO plugin, jQuery, Swiper.js, Contact Form 7
Platforms
WordPress CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Secure cookie with SameSite=Lax
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of reputable plugins

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics (via gtag.js)
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Marketing tools
FreshMail (newsletter service)
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenge
  2. Content is comprehensive and professionally presented
  3. Strong focus on environmental compliance and recycling services
  4. Multiple social media and external educational campaign links
  5. Use of modern web technologies and SEO best practices
  6. Cookie consent banner present and GDPR privacy policy available
  7. Contact information is clear and includes multiple channels
  8. No visible security policy or incident response contact publicly disclosed
  9. No suspicious or malicious content detected
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS using modern plugins such as Yoast SEO for search optimization, Contact Form 7 for forms, and Swiper.js for interactive sliders. The site loads jQuery and uses asynchronous loading for analytics scripts, contributing to moderate performance. Mobile optimization is good with responsive design and appropriate image sizes. Accessibility is basic but could be improved. The site uses structured data (JSON-LD) for SEO and rich snippets. There is no evidence of legacy or vulnerable libraries. Hosting provider details are not explicit. Overall, the technical infrastructure is modern and well-maintained with opportunities for performance and accessibility enhancements.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with rekopol.pl. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review rekopol.pl.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.