Skip to main content

Security report for reklamasprodukcija.lv

Other · N/a

High risk. 9 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Network security and 1 other check.

Security score

45/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website reklamasprodukcija.lv is currently inaccessible, returning a 403 Forbidden error page served by Apache on Debian. This indicates that access to the site is restricted or misconfigured, preventing any meaningful content or business information from being retrieved or analyzed. Due to the lack of accessible content, no metadata, forms, contact details, or business descriptions are available. The WHOIS lookup failed due to query limits, leaving domain registration details unknown and limiting trust and legitimacy assessments. From a technical perspective, the site runs on Apache 2.4.59 on Debian, but no CMS, frameworks, or modern technologies are detectable. The absence of security headers and the presence of a 403 error suggest potential misconfiguration or overly restrictive access controls. SSL/TLS is enabled as the site is accessed via HTTPS, but no further details on certificate quality or security headers are available. Security posture is weak due to the lack of accessible content and missing security best practices. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies are found, indicating poor privacy compliance. No contact or incident response information is available, which further reduces trustworthiness. The domain's WHOIS data is unavailable, which raises concerns about transparency and legitimacy. Overall, the site presents a high risk due to inaccessibility and lack of information. Strategic recommendations include correcting server access permissions, implementing security headers, publishing privacy and cookie policies, and ensuring WHOIS data transparency to improve trust and compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

9 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

  2. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • Critical

      Critical Service Exposed: MySQL

      Port 3306 (MySQL) is publicly accessible - MySQL - Database server

      What to do: Immediately restrict access to MySQL using firewall or VPN

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching reklamasprodukcija.lv

This scan found 26 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
95
Security headers
15
Email security
55
DNS health
80
Network security
0
GDPR outside view
25
Average
45

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet · found on this site
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Due to the site's inaccessibility, no direct business intelligence can be derived. The domain name suggests a focus on advertising production services (reklamas produkcija in Latvian), but no concrete business model, market positioning, or service details are available. No partnerships or subsidiaries are identifiable. The lack of accessible content and WHOIS data limits insights into revenue streams, target customers, or growth indicators.

Security posture

The current security posture is weak. The site is protected by a 403 Forbidden error, which may be intentional access control or misconfiguration. No security headers or advanced protections are detected. The absence of privacy and cookie policies indicates non-compliance with GDPR and other regulations. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure mechanisms are present. The lack of WHOIS transparency further reduces trust. Immediate improvements are needed to enable secure access, implement security best practices, and comply with privacy regulations.

Recommendations

  1. Correct server access permissions to allow legitimate user access and avoid 403 Forbidden errors.
  2. Implement essential security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security.
  3. Publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to improve GDPR compliance and user trust.
  4. Ensure WHOIS data is accessible and accurate to enhance domain legitimacy and transparency.
  5. Establish incident response and vulnerability disclosure contacts to improve security readiness and trust.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Generic detected. Website returns a 403 Forbidden error page served by Apache/2.4.59 on Debian, indicating access is blocked or restricted. These observations may be incomplete. For a fuller analysis, contact guard@offseq.com.

Business

Content quality
poor
Branding
inconsistent

Technology

Stack
Apache/2.4.59, Debian
Performance
slow
Mobile
poor
Accessibility
poor
SEO
poor

Security

Observed score
20/100

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
poor
User experience
poor
Content relevance
poor
Navigation
poor
Professionalism
poor
Trustworthiness
low

Key observations

  1. Website content is inaccessible due to 403 Forbidden error.
  2. No metadata, forms, scripts, or external links detected due to blocked content.
  3. No contact or business information available on the site.
  4. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found.
  5. No security headers or advanced security configurations detected.
  6. WHOIS data unavailable, limiting domain trust analysis.
  7. Site likely misconfigured or access restricted by server settings.
  8. No indications of adult or questionable content.
  9. Analysis incomplete due to blocked content.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is hosted on an Apache 2.4.59 server running Debian. No CMS or modern web frameworks are detected due to inaccessible content. The site uses HTTPS but lacks visible security headers or meta tags. Performance and mobile optimization cannot be assessed due to blocked content. The 403 Forbidden error suggests restrictive server configuration or IP-based access control. Technical debt and modernization opportunities include enabling proper access, adding security headers, and improving SEO and accessibility features.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with reklamasprodukcija.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review reklamasprodukcija.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.